Optimizing Preoperative Assessment Timing to Reduce Surgical Cancellations: A Quality Improvement Project

Introduction Elective surgery cancellations are a major cause of inefficiency in healthcare systems, leading to wasted operating theater time, increased costs, and longer waiting lists. Many cancellations are attributable to inadequate preoperative assessment or incomplete optimization, especially when assessments are performed immediately before surgery. Preoperative assessment clinics allow timely identification and management of comorbidities, ensuring patients are medically optimized and required investigations are complete before the day of surgery. This project aimed to evaluate whether introducing earlier preoperative assessments could reduce cancellations for elective surgeries. Methods A quality improvement project was conducted at a public sector District Headquarters Hospital in Punjab, Pakistan. In cycle 1 (November 2021-January 2022), preoperative assessments were performed ≤1 hour before surgery. In cycle 2 (December 2022-February 2023), assessments were conducted ≥24 hours before surgery. Data on elective surgical cases (orthopedics, general surgery, and ENT) were collected from anesthesia postponement logs. The primary outcome was the rate of postponements due to inadequate optimization or incomplete laboratory work-up, and wasted bed days per 100 patients. Chi-squared testing was employed, with <i>p</i> < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results A total of 1,884 patients were included across the two cycles. During cycle 1, 1,129 cases were assessed, while in cycle 2, a total of 755 cases were evaluated. Sixty-nine patients (6.1%) were postponed during the time frame for cycle 1. In contrast, 23 patients (3.0%) experienced delays to theaters during cycle 2. This represented a relative risk reduction of 50%, with an absolute risk reduction of 3.07%, which was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.02). Wasted bed days per 100 patients decreased from 20.1 to 6.8. Conclusion Shifting preoperative assessments to at least 24 hours before surgery halved avoidable cancellations, reduced wasted bed days, and improved operating theater efficiency. This low-cost intervention is especially relevant for resource-limited health systems where theater efficiency and bed availability are critical.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.94177
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Preoperative Assessment Timing to Reduce Surgical Cancellations: A Quality Improvement Project

Hafsa Amjad, Rabia Khalid, Muhammad Zaeem, Hassan Imtiaz et al.
Cureus
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Optimizing Preoperative Assessment Timing to Reduce Surgical Cancellations: A Quality Improvement Project

Hafsa Amjad, Rabia Khalid, Muhammad Zaeem, Hassan Imtiaz, Asma Ghafoor Jan, F. Tariq, T. Said Ahmed, Rabia Asghar, Usamah Mazhar, Usama Shahbaz
article en

Abstract

Introduction Elective surgery cancellations are a major cause of inefficiency in healthcare systems, leading to wasted operating theater time, increased costs, and longer waiting lists. Many cancellations are attributable to inadequate preoperative assessment or incomplete optimization, especially when assessments are performed immediately before surgery. Preoperative assessment clinics allow timely identification and management of comorbidities, ensuring patients are medically optimized and required investigations are complete before the day of surgery. This project aimed to evaluate whether introducing earlier preoperative assessments could reduce cancellations for elective surgeries. Methods A quality improvement project was conducted at a public sector District Headquarters Hospital in Punjab, Pakistan. In cycle 1 (November 2021-January 2022), preoperative assessments were performed ≤1 hour before surgery. In cycle 2 (December 2022-February 2023), assessments were conducted ≥24 hours before surgery. Data on elective surgical cases (orthopedics, general surgery, and ENT) were collected from anesthesia postponement logs. The primary outcome was the rate of postponements due to inadequate optimization or incomplete laboratory work-up, and wasted bed days per 100 patients. Chi-squared testing was employed, with <i>p</i> < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results A total of 1,884 patients were included across the two cycles. During cycle 1, 1,129 cases were assessed, while in cycle 2, a total of 755 cases were evaluated. Sixty-nine patients (6.1%) were postponed during the time frame for cycle 1. In contrast, 23 patients (3.0%) experienced delays to theaters during cycle 2. This represented a relative risk reduction of 50%, with an absolute risk reduction of 3.07%, which was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.02). Wasted bed days per 100 patients decreased from 20.1 to 6.8. Conclusion Shifting preoperative assessments to at least 24 hours before surgery halved avoidable cancellations, reduced wasted bed days, and improved operating theater efficiency. This low-cost intervention is especially relevant for resource-limited health systems where theater efficiency and bed availability are critical.

CureusVol. 17(10)
Royal Bournemouth Hospital (GB), Poole Hospital (GB), Shaikh Zayed Hospital (PK), Allied Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.