Testing the validity of SustainABLE-16 and SustainABLE-8 Questionnaires to assess the views of older people in Australia on environmental sustainability

• The SustainABLE-16 tool was validated for the first time in Australia. • SustainABLE-16 was found to be less suited in this context. • Shorter SustainABLE-8 proved to be a valid and suitable tool for South Australia. • Pro-environmental behaviours were found to be strongly influenced Beliefs in sustainability. • Weak correlation exists between Pro-environmental behaviour and Financial position. Older people have an important role to play in achieving environmental sustainability; however, studies to investigate their intentions and behaviours to achieve sustainability are scarce. To respond to this gap in knowledge, the SustainABLE-16 tool has been developed to measure how older people view environmental sustainability. The tool has been validated in Poland, Romania, North Macedonia and Israel. This paper presents a further validation of SustainABLE-16 in South Australia, involving 147 older people. The results show that, similar to the previous validations, when applied in South Australia the full version of SustainABLe-16 did not meet internationally-recognised fit requirements; however, the shorter version, SustainABLE-8, is shown to be a reliable and valid measure for use in this context. With SustainABLE-8, the three latent constructs – Pro-environmental behaviours, Financial position, and Beliefs – were found to have strong factors loadings, indicating that the observed variables reliably represented their respective latent constructs. The results also showed that among the respondents there was a strong association between Pro-environmental behaviours and Beliefs; however, Pro-environmental behaviours were found to have a weak correlation with Financial position. While SustainABLE-8 has been shown to be a valid tool for use in an Australian context, further Australian validations are required particularly with more diverse samples, including older people with lower socio-economic status and culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Futures
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101419
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the validity of SustainABLE-16 and SustainABLE-8 Questionnaires to assess the views of older people in Australia on environmental sustainability

Jeroen Dikken, Romy Wasserman, Veronica Soebarto, Joost van Hoof et al.
Sustainable Futures
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
article

Testing the validity of SustainABLE-16 and SustainABLE-8 Questionnaires to assess the views of older people in Australia on environmental sustainability

Jeroen Dikken, Romy Wasserman, Veronica Soebarto, Joost van Hoof, Helen Barrie
article en

Abstract

• The SustainABLE-16 tool was validated for the first time in Australia. • SustainABLE-16 was found to be less suited in this context. • Shorter SustainABLE-8 proved to be a valid and suitable tool for South Australia. • Pro-environmental behaviours were found to be strongly influenced Beliefs in sustainability. • Weak correlation exists between Pro-environmental behaviour and Financial position. Older people have an important role to play in achieving environmental sustainability; however, studies to investigate their intentions and behaviours to achieve sustainability are scarce. To respond to this gap in knowledge, the SustainABLE-16 tool has been developed to measure how older people view environmental sustainability. The tool has been validated in Poland, Romania, North Macedonia and Israel. This paper presents a further validation of SustainABLE-16 in South Australia, involving 147 older people. The results show that, similar to the previous validations, when applied in South Australia the full version of SustainABLe-16 did not meet internationally-recognised fit requirements; however, the shorter version, SustainABLE-8, is shown to be a reliable and valid measure for use in this context. With SustainABLE-8, the three latent constructs – Pro-environmental behaviours, Financial position, and Beliefs – were found to have strong factors loadings, indicating that the observed variables reliably represented their respective latent constructs. The results also showed that among the respondents there was a strong association between Pro-environmental behaviours and Beliefs; however, Pro-environmental behaviours were found to have a weak correlation with Financial position. While SustainABLE-8 has been shown to be a valid tool for use in an Australian context, further Australian validations are required particularly with more diverse samples, including older people with lower socio-economic status and culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.

Sustainable FuturesVol. 10
University of South Australia (AU), Estonian University of Life Sciences (EE), The University of Adelaide (AU), The Hague University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.