Diplomacy at the Highest Level. The Case of Polish Presidents

<ns3:p> The aim of this article is to analyse the dynamics and intensity of diplomacy at the highest level in the practice of Poland’s foreign policy after 1989. From the perspective of international law, high-level diplomacy is understood as a form of special diplomatic mission. A defining characteristic of such a mission is the status of the individual leading it. Diplomatic studies, meanwhile, employ the concept of <ns3:italic>summit diplomacy</ns3:italic> . For the purposes of this article, the term <ns3:italic>diplomacy at the highest level</ns3:italic> will be used, as it integrates both the international legal perspective and the approach of diplomatic studies. In the article the relationship between a state’s stage of development and the intensity of its presidents’ international activity is examined. The following research questions are posed: (1) What was the intensity of international activity by Polish presidents? (2) What were the factors influencing the international activity of individual Polish presidents? The theoretical framework of this article is interdisciplinary, combining international legal approaches, diplomatic studies, and political science perspectives. The adopted research strategy allows for the use of both quantitative methods (quantitative data analysis) and qualitative methods (comparative method and case study). The paper concludes that the most active period of the presidency after 1989 was characterized by significant events, such as accession to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation and the European Union, which undoubtedly required increased efforts on the international stage. Additionally, three main types of factors influencing the international activity of Polish presidents after 1989 can be identified: i <ns3:italic>nternal factors</ns3:italic> – relating to the President’s position within the constitutional system; i <ns3:italic>nternational factors</ns3:italic> – connected to the state of the global environment; s <ns3:italic>ubjective factors</ns3:italic> – such as the President’s knowledge and understanding of international affairs. </ns3:p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Stosunki międzynarodowe/Stosunki Międzynarodowe
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/stomiedintrelat.18262.1
Primary Topic
Leadership, Human Resources, Global Affairs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diplomacy at the Highest Level. The Case of Polish Presidents

Anna Umińska-Woroniecka, Beata Surmacz
Stosunki międzynarodowe/Stosunki Międzynarodowe
Leadership, Human Resources, Global Affairs
article

Diplomacy at the Highest Level. The Case of Polish Presidents

Anna Umińska-Woroniecka, Beata Surmacz
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p> The aim of this article is to analyse the dynamics and intensity of diplomacy at the highest level in the practice of Poland’s foreign policy after 1989. From the perspective of international law, high-level diplomacy is understood as a form of special diplomatic mission. A defining characteristic of such a mission is the status of the individual leading it. Diplomatic studies, meanwhile, employ the concept of <ns3:italic>summit diplomacy</ns3:italic> . For the purposes of this article, the term <ns3:italic>diplomacy at the highest level</ns3:italic> will be used, as it integrates both the international legal perspective and the approach of diplomatic studies. In the article the relationship between a state’s stage of development and the intensity of its presidents’ international activity is examined. The following research questions are posed: (1) What was the intensity of international activity by Polish presidents? (2) What were the factors influencing the international activity of individual Polish presidents? The theoretical framework of this article is interdisciplinary, combining international legal approaches, diplomatic studies, and political science perspectives. The adopted research strategy allows for the use of both quantitative methods (quantitative data analysis) and qualitative methods (comparative method and case study). The paper concludes that the most active period of the presidency after 1989 was characterized by significant events, such as accession to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation and the European Union, which undoubtedly required increased efforts on the international stage. Additionally, three main types of factors influencing the international activity of Polish presidents after 1989 can be identified: i <ns3:italic>nternal factors</ns3:italic> – relating to the President’s position within the constitutional system; i <ns3:italic>nternational factors</ns3:italic> – connected to the state of the global environment; s <ns3:italic>ubjective factors</ns3:italic> – such as the President’s knowledge and understanding of international affairs. </ns3:p>

Stosunki międzynarodowe/Stosunki MiędzynarodoweVol. 5
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Leadership, Human Resources, Global Affairs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Diplomacy at the Highest Level. The Case of Polish Presidents — Anna Umińska-Woroniecka, Beata Surmacz · Stosunki międzynarodowe/Stosunki Międzynarodowe (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS