Bloom’s Taxonomy as a Lens to Explore Student Learning of Design Thinking in Software Engineering Education and Training

Background: Design Thinking (DT) has been widely adopted in Software Engineering (SE) for its emphasis on creativity, user understanding, and iterative problem-solving. However, in the context of SE Education and Training (SEET), there is a lack of empirical research exploring how students internalize, engage with, and perceive DT-related content. Aims: Our research aims to understand how SE students perceive and internalize DT concepts during their training. Method: We conducted semi-structured interviews with nine students who had previous contact with DT through an SE course. We used Bloom’s Taxonomy as a foundation, as it offers a structured framework to assess the cognitive levels students reach when learning a given topic. This approach allowed us to explore how students process, retain, and apply DT-related knowledge. We analyzed the data using Grounded Theory procedures. Results: Analyzing through the lens of Bloom’s framework, we found individual differences in the depth of learning and consolidation of DT concepts. Three participants demonstrated analysis-level abilities, four reached the synthesis level, and two attained evaluation-level skills. Our findings also reveal that students associate DT with creativity, user understanding, freedom to explore options, and goal orientation. They also recognized the value of DT techniques for organizing data, guiding technical decisions, and supporting the software development process. Based on our findings, we propose an empirically-based conceptual model that structures students’ perspectives on the use of the DT in SE. Conclusions: We hope our contributions can assist educators in developing strategies to help students better retain DT content, with emphasis on SEET, as our results offer a structured understanding of how students internalize DT in SE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5753/sbes.2025.11302
Primary Topic
Open Education and E-Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bloom’s Taxonomy as a Lens to Explore Student Learning of Design Thinking in Software Engineering Education and Training

NAHL Silva, José Carlos Maldonado, Tayana Conte, Maria Alcimar Costa Meireles et al.
Open Education and E-Learning
article

Bloom’s Taxonomy as a Lens to Explore Student Learning of Design Thinking in Software Engineering Education and Training

NAHL Silva, José Carlos Maldonado, Tayana Conte, Maria Alcimar Costa Meireles, Márcia Lima, Eriky Rodrigues
article en

Abstract

Background: Design Thinking (DT) has been widely adopted in Software Engineering (SE) for its emphasis on creativity, user understanding, and iterative problem-solving. However, in the context of SE Education and Training (SEET), there is a lack of empirical research exploring how students internalize, engage with, and perceive DT-related content. Aims: Our research aims to understand how SE students perceive and internalize DT concepts during their training. Method: We conducted semi-structured interviews with nine students who had previous contact with DT through an SE course. We used Bloom’s Taxonomy as a foundation, as it offers a structured framework to assess the cognitive levels students reach when learning a given topic. This approach allowed us to explore how students process, retain, and apply DT-related knowledge. We analyzed the data using Grounded Theory procedures. Results: Analyzing through the lens of Bloom’s framework, we found individual differences in the depth of learning and consolidation of DT concepts. Three participants demonstrated analysis-level abilities, four reached the synthesis level, and two attained evaluation-level skills. Our findings also reveal that students associate DT with creativity, user understanding, freedom to explore options, and goal orientation. They also recognized the value of DT techniques for organizing data, guiding technical decisions, and supporting the software development process. Based on our findings, we propose an empirically-based conceptual model that structures students’ perspectives on the use of the DT in SE. Conclusions: We hope our contributions can assist educators in developing strategies to help students better retain DT content, with emphasis on SEET, as our results offer a structured understanding of how students internalize DT in SE.

Universidad San Pedro (PE)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Open Education and E-Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.