O potrzebie wyeliminowania wyroku zaocznego z Kodeksu postępowania w sprawach o wykroczenia

Petty offence proceedings constitute a distinct type of procedure, separate from criminal proceedings, concerning prohibited acts defined in the Polish Petty Offence Code as well as other acts classified as petty offences. Compared with criminal proceedings, they are characterised by numerous differences and simplifications designed to ensure greater efficiency and procedural economy. One such difference is the institution of the default judgment, rendered in the absence of the accused at the hearing. This institution is outdated and disproportionate in view of the subject matter of such proceedings. Moreover, in the context of petty offence proceedings, the legislator affords disproportionately broader rights to an accused who did not participate in the hearing at which the judgment was issued, as compared with criminal proceedings. For these reasons, it is argued that the default judgment should be eliminated from petty offence proceedings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Radca Prawny
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4467/23921943rp.25.032.22318
Primary Topic
Polish Legal and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

O potrzebie wyeliminowania wyroku zaocznego z Kodeksu postępowania w sprawach o wykroczenia

Jan Kluza
Radca Prawny
Polish Legal and Social Issues
article

O potrzebie wyeliminowania wyroku zaocznego z Kodeksu postępowania w sprawach o wykroczenia

Jan Kluza
article en

Abstract

Petty offence proceedings constitute a distinct type of procedure, separate from criminal proceedings, concerning prohibited acts defined in the Polish Petty Offence Code as well as other acts classified as petty offences. Compared with criminal proceedings, they are characterised by numerous differences and simplifications designed to ensure greater efficiency and procedural economy. One such difference is the institution of the default judgment, rendered in the absence of the accused at the hearing. This institution is outdated and disproportionate in view of the subject matter of such proceedings. Moreover, in the context of petty offence proceedings, the legislator affords disproportionately broader rights to an accused who did not participate in the hearing at which the judgment was issued, as compared with criminal proceedings. For these reasons, it is argued that the default judgment should be eliminated from petty offence proceedings.

Radca PrawnyVol. 44(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Polish Legal and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

O potrzebie wyeliminowania wyroku zaocznego z Kodeksu postępowania w sprawach o wykroczenia — Jan Kluza · Radca Prawny (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS