Cytogenetic analysis of the effects of a new epimutagenic agent on chromosomal stability in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum)

This study evaluated the epimutagenic potential of Nonidet P-40 (NP-40) in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by assessing its capacity to induce chromosomal aberrations, elucidating genotype–mutagen interactions, and determining its predictive value at the cellular level for inducing heritable epigenetic mutations. Four winter wheat varieties (Farell, NE 12443, Ronin, and Seilor) were exposed to NP-40 concentrations of 0.01%, 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.5%. The cytogenetic analyses included assessments of pollen sterility and the frequency and spectrum of chromosomal aberrations in root-tip meristematic cells during mitosis. The results demonstrated significant genotype-specific responses to NP-40 treatment, with varieties Farell and, to a lesser extent, Ronin identified as particularly sensitive. These varieties exhibited a pronounced susceptibility, highlighting their suitability for targeted induction of genetic variability and subsequent mutant selection. Of the tested NP-40 concentrations, 0.5% NP-40 was observed to be the most effective, inducing substantial chromosomal aberrations while maintaining acceptable plant viability, thereby optimizing mutation induction and minimizing adverse cytotoxic effects. Conversely, moderate NP-40 concentrations (0.01–0.1%) were less effective, yielding a suboptimal balance between induced genetic variability and viability. Key cytogenetic indicators of genotype-specific sensitivity included pollen fertility, the total frequency of chromosomal rearrangements, and the number of chromosomal bridges. By contrast, parameters such as fragment abundance and the occurrence of rare aberrations were analytically less informative. Notably, the NP-40-induced chromosomal aberration patterns differed markedly from those typically observed with classical chemical supermutagens, with responses significantly influenced by genetic background. These findings offer valuable insights into the epimutagenic properties of NP-40, emphasizing the critical role of genotype selection and concentration optimization in effective mutation breeding strategies. Future research will integrate these cytogenetic observations with analyses of hereditary variability in biochemical and physiological traits, enhancing epimutagenic methodologies and improving breeding programs aimed at winter wheat cultivar advancement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agrology
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32819/202517
Primary Topic
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cytogenetic analysis of the effects of a new epimutagenic agent on chromosomal stability in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum)

М. Nazarenko, О.М. Окселенко, V. Horshchar
Agrology
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
article

Cytogenetic analysis of the effects of a new epimutagenic agent on chromosomal stability in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum)

М. Nazarenko, О.М. Окселенко, V. Horshchar
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the epimutagenic potential of Nonidet P-40 (NP-40) in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by assessing its capacity to induce chromosomal aberrations, elucidating genotype–mutagen interactions, and determining its predictive value at the cellular level for inducing heritable epigenetic mutations. Four winter wheat varieties (Farell, NE 12443, Ronin, and Seilor) were exposed to NP-40 concentrations of 0.01%, 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.5%. The cytogenetic analyses included assessments of pollen sterility and the frequency and spectrum of chromosomal aberrations in root-tip meristematic cells during mitosis. The results demonstrated significant genotype-specific responses to NP-40 treatment, with varieties Farell and, to a lesser extent, Ronin identified as particularly sensitive. These varieties exhibited a pronounced susceptibility, highlighting their suitability for targeted induction of genetic variability and subsequent mutant selection. Of the tested NP-40 concentrations, 0.5% NP-40 was observed to be the most effective, inducing substantial chromosomal aberrations while maintaining acceptable plant viability, thereby optimizing mutation induction and minimizing adverse cytotoxic effects. Conversely, moderate NP-40 concentrations (0.01–0.1%) were less effective, yielding a suboptimal balance between induced genetic variability and viability. Key cytogenetic indicators of genotype-specific sensitivity included pollen fertility, the total frequency of chromosomal rearrangements, and the number of chromosomal bridges. By contrast, parameters such as fragment abundance and the occurrence of rare aberrations were analytically less informative. Notably, the NP-40-induced chromosomal aberration patterns differed markedly from those typically observed with classical chemical supermutagens, with responses significantly influenced by genetic background. These findings offer valuable insights into the epimutagenic properties of NP-40, emphasizing the critical role of genotype selection and concentration optimization in effective mutation breeding strategies. Future research will integrate these cytogenetic observations with analyses of hereditary variability in biochemical and physiological traits, enhancing epimutagenic methodologies and improving breeding programs aimed at winter wheat cultivar advancement.

AgrologyVol. 8(3)
Dnipro State Agrarian and Economic University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.