Paradigmatic Foundations and Origins of the Global Nazi Project

This article describes and characterizes European Nazism as an unfinished historical phenomenon. It argues that Nazism will persist as long as the concept of the global West exists. The author points out that Russian society still has not developed a coherent and systematic concept of fascism. From the author’s perspective, Nazism does not represent an “affective” reaction to the culture of modernity, as theorists of the Frankfurt School argued, but rather constitutes the most radical and overt manifestation of modernity itself. According to the author, fascism is the generative ideology of the European modernist enlightenment project. He considers it necessary to reject the myth of Nazism as an allegedly unforeseen historical “breakdown” within Western democracy. A contemporary concept of Nazism must be resilient to liberal narratives and discourses, in order to avoid reproducing false constructs aimed at rehabilitating the core Nazi myths under altered linguistic and stylistic forms. The author emphasizes the need to lift the taboo surrounding the West’s responsibility for fascism and colonialism. This critical reorientation is essential for returning humanity to a Biblical system of values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthodoxia
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2025-1-30-43
Primary Topic
Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paradigmatic Foundations and Origins of the Global Nazi Project

A. V. Shchipkov
Orthodoxia
Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
article

Paradigmatic Foundations and Origins of the Global Nazi Project

A. V. Shchipkov
article en

Abstract

This article describes and characterizes European Nazism as an unfinished historical phenomenon. It argues that Nazism will persist as long as the concept of the global West exists. The author points out that Russian society still has not developed a coherent and systematic concept of fascism. From the author’s perspective, Nazism does not represent an “affective” reaction to the culture of modernity, as theorists of the Frankfurt School argued, but rather constitutes the most radical and overt manifestation of modernity itself. According to the author, fascism is the generative ideology of the European modernist enlightenment project. He considers it necessary to reject the myth of Nazism as an allegedly unforeseen historical “breakdown” within Western democracy. A contemporary concept of Nazism must be resilient to liberal narratives and discourses, in order to avoid reproducing false constructs aimed at rehabilitating the core Nazi myths under altered linguistic and stylistic forms. The author emphasizes the need to lift the taboo surrounding the West’s responsibility for fascism and colonialism. This critical reorientation is essential for returning humanity to a Biblical system of values.

Orthodoxia(1)
Russian Orthodox Institute Sacred Ioann Bogolslov (RU)
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.