The Moderating Effect of Regulatory Framework on the Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Triple Bottom Line Performance of Microfinance Institutions in Kenya

Microfinance institutions in Kenya continue to face persistent financial instability despite their critical role in promoting financial inclusion and socio-economic growth. This study examined how the regulatory framework moderates the relationship between corporate governance and Triple Bottom Line (TBL) performance of microfinance institutions (MFIs). The purpose was to determine whether regulatory structures strengthen or weaken the effect of governance practices on financial, social, and environmental outcomes. Primary data were obtained through structured questionnaires administered to 84 respondents drawn from 14 purposively selected microfinance banks out of 47 institutions registered under the Association of Microfinance Institutions of Kenya as of December 2024. Stratified random sampling was applied, and data were analyzed using SPSS through descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and hierarchical multiple regression. Results revealed that governance indicators board size, activity, diversity, independence, and audit quality positively influenced TBL performance, while inclusion of the regulatory framework increased explanatory power from 53.2% to 65.1%. Significant interaction effects between regulation and governance variables, particularly board size, independence, and audit quality, confirmed the moderating role of the regulatory framework. The study concludes that effective regulation amplifies good governance, thereby enhancing financial stability, social outreach, and environmental responsibility. However, excessive regulatory pressure can hinder innovation and impose compliance burdens that weaken performance. The study recommends that policymakers and regulators adopt a balanced approach that integrates governance reforms with adaptive regulatory oversight to promote resilient, socially inclusive, and environmentally sustainable microfinance institutions aligned with Kenya’s Vision 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals. Keywords: Moderating Effect, Regulatory Framework, Corporate Governance, Triple Bottom Line, Performance, Microfinance Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Finance and Accounting
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t3150
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Moderating Effect of Regulatory Framework on the Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Triple Bottom Line Performance of Microfinance Institutions in Kenya

Journal of Finance and Accounting
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
article

The Moderating Effect of Regulatory Framework on the Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Triple Bottom Line Performance of Microfinance Institutions in Kenya

article en

Abstract

Microfinance institutions in Kenya continue to face persistent financial instability despite their critical role in promoting financial inclusion and socio-economic growth. This study examined how the regulatory framework moderates the relationship between corporate governance and Triple Bottom Line (TBL) performance of microfinance institutions (MFIs). The purpose was to determine whether regulatory structures strengthen or weaken the effect of governance practices on financial, social, and environmental outcomes. Primary data were obtained through structured questionnaires administered to 84 respondents drawn from 14 purposively selected microfinance banks out of 47 institutions registered under the Association of Microfinance Institutions of Kenya as of December 2024. Stratified random sampling was applied, and data were analyzed using SPSS through descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and hierarchical multiple regression. Results revealed that governance indicators board size, activity, diversity, independence, and audit quality positively influenced TBL performance, while inclusion of the regulatory framework increased explanatory power from 53.2% to 65.1%. Significant interaction effects between regulation and governance variables, particularly board size, independence, and audit quality, confirmed the moderating role of the regulatory framework. The study concludes that effective regulation amplifies good governance, thereby enhancing financial stability, social outreach, and environmental responsibility. However, excessive regulatory pressure can hinder innovation and impose compliance burdens that weaken performance. The study recommends that policymakers and regulators adopt a balanced approach that integrates governance reforms with adaptive regulatory oversight to promote resilient, socially inclusive, and environmentally sustainable microfinance institutions aligned with Kenya’s Vision 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals. Keywords: Moderating Effect, Regulatory Framework, Corporate Governance, Triple Bottom Line, Performance, Microfinance Institutions

Journal of Finance and AccountingVol. 9(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Moderating Effect of Regulatory Framework on the Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Triple Bottom Line Performance of Microfinance Institutions in Kenya · Journal of Finance and Accounting (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS