Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Design and Manufacturing: Status and Challenges

Abstract Machine learning (ML) technique is a critical tool to promote optimal design and ensure reliable and efficient products and processes in the manufacturing industry, since it can discover hidden knowledge and build complex relationships by learning patterns from data. However, the inherent ‘black-box’ nature of ML presents a major challenge in interpreting the mechanism and outcomes of the models. Moreover, reliable ML predictions are highly dependent on the amount and quality of training data. To address these issues, physics-informed machine learning (PIML), also known as scientific machine learning, has emerged as a new research field. PIML incorporates physical and domain knowledge into ML models to guide the ML training process, which enables more interpretable and reliable models. To fully leverage the advantages of PIML and promote the advancement of design and manufacturing, it is essential for researchers to understand the available PIML methodologies and the technical challenges of PIML methods. This article provides a systematic review of the state-of-the-art in PIML, focusing on the methodologies of integrating physics into ML. The PIML techniques can be grouped into three categories, including hybrid models, physical loss-based models, and physics-embedded architectures. Each of these categories is further stratified according to different integration approaches and ML models. The methods and applications of each technique are summarized. In addition, the technical challenges and potential opportunities of PIML are critically analyzed and discussed, providing a roadmap to narrow the research gaps in PIML.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4070100
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Design and Manufacturing: Status and Challenges

Yan Wang, Tong Zhu, Dehao Liu, Yanglong Lu et al.
1 citations
Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
1.24
article

Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Design and Manufacturing: Status and Challenges

Yan Wang, Tong Zhu, Dehao Liu, Yanglong Lu, Longye Pan, Guangfa Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Machine learning (ML) technique is a critical tool to promote optimal design and ensure reliable and efficient products and processes in the manufacturing industry, since it can discover hidden knowledge and build complex relationships by learning patterns from data. However, the inherent ‘black-box’ nature of ML presents a major challenge in interpreting the mechanism and outcomes of the models. Moreover, reliable ML predictions are highly dependent on the amount and quality of training data. To address these issues, physics-informed machine learning (PIML), also known as scientific machine learning, has emerged as a new research field. PIML incorporates physical and domain knowledge into ML models to guide the ML training process, which enables more interpretable and reliable models. To fully leverage the advantages of PIML and promote the advancement of design and manufacturing, it is essential for researchers to understand the available PIML methodologies and the technical challenges of PIML methods. This article provides a systematic review of the state-of-the-art in PIML, focusing on the methodologies of integrating physics into ML. The PIML techniques can be grouped into three categories, including hybrid models, physical loss-based models, and physics-embedded architectures. Each of these categories is further stratified according to different integration approaches and ML models. The methods and applications of each technique are summarized. In addition, the technical challenges and potential opportunities of PIML are critically analyzed and discussed, providing a roadmap to narrow the research gaps in PIML.

Journal of Computing and Information Science in EngineeringVol. 25(12)
Binghamton University (US), Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), Woodruff Health Sciences Center (US), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Innovation and Technology Commission, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
1.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.