Lucian and His Alexander, a.k.a. <i>Fake Prophet</i>: Fake News and Invective Mirrored

Abstract Lucian the sophist wrote an epistolary essay that condemns the spiritualist Alexander of Abonuteichos for criminal fraud, social and sexual self-aggrandizement, and sexual mischief, first among his native Paphlagonians and then far beyond in second-century Roman Anatolia. Both men prospered by their verbal agility and daring performances. Both succeeded remarkably in the imperial oikoumene. They competed for attention with contrasting worldviews. Alexander's strategies of persuasion began with divine miracles and prophecies but extended to a campaign of disinformation about and invective against his foes (Epicureans, Christians, and Lucian, among others). Lucian, in the name of philosophical truth, employs similar tropes, exposing a snake with a puppet's humanoid head, the prophet's lavish lifestyle and dubious murder plot against the fearless Lucian, and feckless belief among his followers. Both men present themselves as devoted expounders of differing realities. We must find Alexander, however, almost entirely through this bemused Lucian, whose invective only sees positives in Alexander when they serve to convict him of superior hoodwinking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Illinois Classical Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5406/23285265.50.1.05
Primary Topic
African studies and sociopolitical issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lucian and His Alexander, a.k.a. Fake Prophet: Fake News and Invective Mirrored

Donald Lateiner
Illinois Classical Studies
African studies and sociopolitical issues
article

Lucian and His Alexander, a.k.a. Fake Prophet: Fake News and Invective Mirrored

Donald Lateiner
article en

Abstract

Abstract Lucian the sophist wrote an epistolary essay that condemns the spiritualist Alexander of Abonuteichos for criminal fraud, social and sexual self-aggrandizement, and sexual mischief, first among his native Paphlagonians and then far beyond in second-century Roman Anatolia. Both men prospered by their verbal agility and daring performances. Both succeeded remarkably in the imperial oikoumene. They competed for attention with contrasting worldviews. Alexander's strategies of persuasion began with divine miracles and prophecies but extended to a campaign of disinformation about and invective against his foes (Epicureans, Christians, and Lucian, among others). Lucian, in the name of philosophical truth, employs similar tropes, exposing a snake with a puppet's humanoid head, the prophet's lavish lifestyle and dubious murder plot against the fearless Lucian, and feckless belief among his followers. Both men present themselves as devoted expounders of differing realities. We must find Alexander, however, almost entirely through this bemused Lucian, whose invective only sees positives in Alexander when they serve to convict him of superior hoodwinking.

Illinois Classical StudiesVol. 50(1)
Ohio Wesleyan University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
African studies and sociopolitical issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Lucian and His Alexander, a.k.a. <i>Fake Prophet</i>: Fake News and Invective Mirrored — Donald Lateiner · Illinois Classical Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS