Mapping the Trust Terrain: LLMs in Software Engineering - Insights and Perspectives

The application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Software Engineering (SE) continues to grow rapidly across both industry and academia. As these models become integral to critical SE processes, ensuring their reliability and trustworthiness becomes essential. Achieving this requires a balanced approach to trust: excessive trust can introduce security vulnerabilities, while insufficient trust may hinder innovation. However, the conceptual landscape of trust in LLMs for SE(LLM4SE) remains unclear. Key concepts such as trust, distrust, and trustworthiness lack precise definitions, factors that shape trust formation remain underexplored, and metrics for trust in LLMs remain undeveloped. To clarify the current research landscape and identify future directions, we conducted a comprehensive review of \(88\) articles: a systematic review of \(18\) studies on LLMs in SE, supplemented by an analysis of \(70\) articles from the broader trust literature. Furthermore, we surveyed \(25\) domain experts to gather practitioners’ perspectives on trust and identify gaps between their experiences and the existing literature. Our findings provide a structured overview of trust-related concepts in LLM4SE, outlining key areas for future research. This study contributes to building more trustworthy LLM-assisted software engineering processes, ultimately supporting safer and more effective adoption of LLMs in SE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3771282
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the Trust Terrain: LLMs in Software Engineering - Insights and Perspectives

David N. Palacio, Yixuan Zhang, Denys Poshyvanyk, Dipin Khati et al.
3 citations
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
7.44
article

Mapping the Trust Terrain: LLMs in Software Engineering - Insights and Perspectives

David N. Palacio, Yixuan Zhang, Denys Poshyvanyk, Dipin Khati, Yijin Liu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Software Engineering (SE) continues to grow rapidly across both industry and academia. As these models become integral to critical SE processes, ensuring their reliability and trustworthiness becomes essential. Achieving this requires a balanced approach to trust: excessive trust can introduce security vulnerabilities, while insufficient trust may hinder innovation. However, the conceptual landscape of trust in LLMs for SE(LLM4SE) remains unclear. Key concepts such as trust, distrust, and trustworthiness lack precise definitions, factors that shape trust formation remain underexplored, and metrics for trust in LLMs remain undeveloped. To clarify the current research landscape and identify future directions, we conducted a comprehensive review of \(88\) articles: a systematic review of \(18\) studies on LLMs in SE, supplemented by an analysis of \(70\) articles from the broader trust literature. Furthermore, we surveyed \(25\) domain experts to gather practitioners’ perspectives on trust and identify gaps between their experiences and the existing literature. Our findings provide a structured overview of trust-related concepts in LLM4SE, outlining key areas for future research. This study contributes to building more trustworthy LLM-assisted software engineering processes, ultimately supporting safer and more effective adoption of LLMs in SE.

ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
William & Mary (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.