Reciprocity, Burden-Sharing, and the Individual Duty of Productive Justice

Abstract This article develops and defends a novel argument for why individuals have a duty to contribute to the realisation of justice by making a productive contribution. Analysing the shortcomings of attempting to ground such a duty in either reciprocity or the idea of sharing burdens, I suggest that the best alternative is a hybrid account which draws on both. The account says that firstly, everyone must make an equally good effort, in relation to their ability, to contribute the socially necessary labour needed to realise a just state of affairs, where everyone receives what they are due. Secondly, if and when this level is reached, everyone has a conditional obligation to further benefit others, if they benefit from the additional work of others. Opting out is thus permissible, since this part is only triggered if one wants to take part of the social surplus produced by others.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-025-06139-x
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reciprocity, Burden-Sharing, and the Individual Duty of Productive Justice

Markus Furendal
Journal of Business Ethics
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

Reciprocity, Burden-Sharing, and the Individual Duty of Productive Justice

Markus Furendal
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article develops and defends a novel argument for why individuals have a duty to contribute to the realisation of justice by making a productive contribution. Analysing the shortcomings of attempting to ground such a duty in either reciprocity or the idea of sharing burdens, I suggest that the best alternative is a hybrid account which draws on both. The account says that firstly, everyone must make an equally good effort, in relation to their ability, to contribute the socially necessary labour needed to realise a just state of affairs, where everyone receives what they are due. Secondly, if and when this level is reached, everyone has a conditional obligation to further benefit others, if they benefit from the additional work of others. Opting out is thus permissible, since this part is only triggered if one wants to take part of the social surplus produced by others.

Journal of Business Ethics
Institute for Futures Studies (SE)
Vetenskapsrådet, Stockholms Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reciprocity, Burden-Sharing, and the Individual Duty of Productive Justice — Markus Furendal · Journal of Business Ethics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS