Effectiveness of Hyaluronidase on Hyaluronic Acid Degradation: An Experimental Study

Hyaluronidase (HYAL) is an enzyme that degrades hyaluronic acid (HA), available in both animal-derived and recombinant formulations. Currently, there is limited evidence comparing the enzyme activity of different HYALs and their effects on various HA filler formulations. The authors of this in vitro study aim to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of animal-derived vs recombinant hyaluronidase on degrading different HA filler formulations. The authors tested 4 experimental groups (<i>n</i> = 5 per group): ART FILLER Universal with animal hyaluronidase, ART FILLER Universal with recombinant hyaluronidase, ART FILLER Volume with animal hyaluronidase, and ART FILLER Volume with recombinant hyaluronidase. HA filler degradation was measured using colorimetric assay (absorbance at 585 nm) at 1, 6, 24, and 48 h of incubation. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis (significance set at <i>P</i> < .05). ART FILLER Universal showed significantly greater degradation than ART FILLER Volume at the 1 h time point (<i>P</i> < .05). Recombinant hyaluronidase demonstrated consistently higher degradation activity compared with animal-derived hyaluronidase at all measurement time points, but it was only statistically significant after 1 h of incubation (<i>P</i> < .05). ART FILLER Volume with animal hyaluronidase exhibited the lowest degradation rates among all groups at 6, 24, and 48 h (<i>P</i> < .05). Based on the findings, the authors indicate that recombinant hyaluronidase is more effective than animal-derived hyaluronidase for HA filler degradation over time. ART FILLER Universal degrades more rapidly than ART FILLER Volume during the first hour of enzyme activity. The results highlight important differences in degradation kinetics between HA filler types and hyaluronidase formulations. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and explore their clinical implications. <b>Level of Evidence</b>: 5 (Therapeutic).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojaf108
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of Hyaluronidase on Hyaluronic Acid Degradation: An Experimental Study

António Mata, Joana F. Marques, Mariana Cruz, Neusa Silva et al.
1 citations
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
2.00
article

Effectiveness of Hyaluronidase on Hyaluronic Acid Degradation: An Experimental Study

António Mata, Joana F. Marques, Mariana Cruz, Neusa Silva, Virgínia Santos, Joana Oliveira
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Hyaluronidase (HYAL) is an enzyme that degrades hyaluronic acid (HA), available in both animal-derived and recombinant formulations. Currently, there is limited evidence comparing the enzyme activity of different HYALs and their effects on various HA filler formulations. The authors of this in vitro study aim to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of animal-derived vs recombinant hyaluronidase on degrading different HA filler formulations. The authors tested 4 experimental groups (<i>n</i> = 5 per group): ART FILLER Universal with animal hyaluronidase, ART FILLER Universal with recombinant hyaluronidase, ART FILLER Volume with animal hyaluronidase, and ART FILLER Volume with recombinant hyaluronidase. HA filler degradation was measured using colorimetric assay (absorbance at 585 nm) at 1, 6, 24, and 48 h of incubation. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis (significance set at <i>P</i> < .05). ART FILLER Universal showed significantly greater degradation than ART FILLER Volume at the 1 h time point (<i>P</i> < .05). Recombinant hyaluronidase demonstrated consistently higher degradation activity compared with animal-derived hyaluronidase at all measurement time points, but it was only statistically significant after 1 h of incubation (<i>P</i> < .05). ART FILLER Volume with animal hyaluronidase exhibited the lowest degradation rates among all groups at 6, 24, and 48 h (<i>P</i> < .05). Based on the findings, the authors indicate that recombinant hyaluronidase is more effective than animal-derived hyaluronidase for HA filler degradation over time. ART FILLER Universal degrades more rapidly than ART FILLER Volume during the first hour of enzyme activity. The results highlight important differences in degradation kinetics between HA filler types and hyaluronidase formulations. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and explore their clinical implications. <b>Level of Evidence</b>: 5 (Therapeutic).

Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open ForumVol. 7
University of Lisbon (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
2.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.