The Law of Control: A Theory of Psychological Exchange and Power

Conventional theories of power emphasize the possession of resources such as wealth, admiration, or social capital. This paper proposes a paradigm shift: power derives less from ownership than from control over the mechanisms through which psychological resources are exchanged. It introduces the Law of Control, which states: “Power in social and psychological exchange is determined not by the quantity of resources held, but by control over the mechanisms of exchange itself. Influence is an illusion if one does not dictate the flow of psychological resources.” Through historical, economic, and digital case studies, the paper demonstrates that institutions, rulers, and platforms secure lasting influence by managing the circulation of attention, validation, and social capital. From monarchs regulating economic trade to social media companies shaping flows of visibility, authority stems from structuring exchanges rather than possessing assets. This framework reframes power as the governance of psychological trade, offering implications for social psychology, media studies, political science, and the study of digital influence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Psychology
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33423/jop.v25i3.7896
Primary Topic
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Law of Control: A Theory of Psychological Exchange and Power

Paul Handré Laubscher
Journal of Organizational Psychology
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
article

The Law of Control: A Theory of Psychological Exchange and Power

Paul Handré Laubscher
article en

Abstract

Conventional theories of power emphasize the possession of resources such as wealth, admiration, or social capital. This paper proposes a paradigm shift: power derives less from ownership than from control over the mechanisms through which psychological resources are exchanged. It introduces the Law of Control, which states: “Power in social and psychological exchange is determined not by the quantity of resources held, but by control over the mechanisms of exchange itself. Influence is an illusion if one does not dictate the flow of psychological resources.” Through historical, economic, and digital case studies, the paper demonstrates that institutions, rulers, and platforms secure lasting influence by managing the circulation of attention, validation, and social capital. From monarchs regulating economic trade to social media companies shaping flows of visibility, authority stems from structuring exchanges rather than possessing assets. This framework reframes power as the governance of psychological trade, offering implications for social psychology, media studies, political science, and the study of digital influence.

Journal of Organizational PsychologyVol. 25(3)
Science Club (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.