Faculty Perceptions of Higher Education Institution Reputation: Understanding the Criteria Behind Academic Decision-Making

Objective: This study examines how faculty in private higher education institutions perceive and prioritize criteria when evaluating institutional reputation. Faculty, as both internal stakeholders and co-creators of reputation, remain underrepresented in reputation research compared to students and external audiences. Theoretical Framework: The study draws on the literature of institutional reputation in higher education, with emphasis on faculty perceptions, ranking systems, and reputation criteria discussed in prior research. This framework supports the analysis of how faculty evaluate and prioritize factors such as staff quality, alumni success, and research productivity. Method: A quantitative, exploratory design employed multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) using the PAPRIKA (Potentially All Pairwise RanKings of all possible Alternatives) method. Eight criteria from peer-reviewed and grey literature guided the analysis: Faculty Quality, Alumni Success, Recognition, Student Quality and Selectivity, Research and Production, Infrastructure and Resources, Financial Stability, and Internationalization. Data were collected through an online survey with 163 faculty respondents from São Paulo's private higher education. Results and Discussion: Findings show that faculty prioritize Faculty Quality and Alumni Success over financial or internationalization metrics, highlighting a gap between faculty perspectives and dimensions emphasized by rankings. Research Implications: Results suggest that institutional strategies should emphasize faculty development and alumni engagement while contextualizing ranking-oriented initiatives. Originality/Value: This is among the first applications of PAPRIKA to faculty perceptions of institutional reputation, providing an empirically grounded hierarchy of criteria and refining reputation theory by showing divergences between internal and external stakeholder priorities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v19n10-004
Primary Topic
Corporate Identity and Reputation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Faculty Perceptions of Higher Education Institution Reputation: Understanding the Criteria Behind Academic Decision-Making

Fellipe Silva Martins, Pablo Turbuk Garrán
Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
Corporate Identity and Reputation
article

Faculty Perceptions of Higher Education Institution Reputation: Understanding the Criteria Behind Academic Decision-Making

Fellipe Silva Martins, Pablo Turbuk Garrán
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study examines how faculty in private higher education institutions perceive and prioritize criteria when evaluating institutional reputation. Faculty, as both internal stakeholders and co-creators of reputation, remain underrepresented in reputation research compared to students and external audiences. Theoretical Framework: The study draws on the literature of institutional reputation in higher education, with emphasis on faculty perceptions, ranking systems, and reputation criteria discussed in prior research. This framework supports the analysis of how faculty evaluate and prioritize factors such as staff quality, alumni success, and research productivity. Method: A quantitative, exploratory design employed multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) using the PAPRIKA (Potentially All Pairwise RanKings of all possible Alternatives) method. Eight criteria from peer-reviewed and grey literature guided the analysis: Faculty Quality, Alumni Success, Recognition, Student Quality and Selectivity, Research and Production, Infrastructure and Resources, Financial Stability, and Internationalization. Data were collected through an online survey with 163 faculty respondents from São Paulo's private higher education. Results and Discussion: Findings show that faculty prioritize Faculty Quality and Alumni Success over financial or internationalization metrics, highlighting a gap between faculty perspectives and dimensions emphasized by rankings. Research Implications: Results suggest that institutional strategies should emphasize faculty development and alumni engagement while contextualizing ranking-oriented initiatives. Originality/Value: This is among the first applications of PAPRIKA to faculty perceptions of institutional reputation, providing an empirically grounded hierarchy of criteria and refining reputation theory by showing divergences between internal and external stakeholder priorities.

Revista de Gestão Social e AmbientalVol. 19(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Corporate Identity and Reputation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.