Evaluation of the influence of gingival retraction width on the optical impression of the subgingival region using a 3D printed abutment tooth model

This study aimed to evaluate the conditions for the finish line position and gingival retraction width that allow for taking optical impressions using three-dimensional (3D) printed models. Taking an impression using an intraoral scanner (IOS) is widely performed in fabricating crown prostheses. Measuring the subgingival finish line using an IOS is difficult; to obtain optical impressions of the subgingival finish line, the gingival retraction has been recommended. However, no study has evaluated the amount of gingival retraction width and the depth of the finish line. In this study, the measurement limits of the subgingival finish line using an IOS and models fabricated by a 3D printer were investigated. The results of this study revealed that TRIOS3 could not measure the finish line when the gingival retraction width was <0.25 mm, and the finish line was located >0.50 mm below the gingival margin.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dental Materials Journal
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2024-269
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the influence of gingival retraction width on the optical impression of the subgingival region using a 3D printed abutment tooth model

Shoichi Ishigaki, Takahiro Nishiyama, Takashi Nakamura, Shingo TAMIYA et al.
Dental Materials Journal
Dental materials and restorations
article

Evaluation of the influence of gingival retraction width on the optical impression of the subgingival region using a 3D printed abutment tooth model

Shoichi Ishigaki, Takahiro Nishiyama, Takashi Nakamura, Shingo TAMIYA, Kazumichi Wakabayashi, Manabu Tanaka
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the conditions for the finish line position and gingival retraction width that allow for taking optical impressions using three-dimensional (3D) printed models. Taking an impression using an intraoral scanner (IOS) is widely performed in fabricating crown prostheses. Measuring the subgingival finish line using an IOS is difficult; to obtain optical impressions of the subgingival finish line, the gingival retraction has been recommended. However, no study has evaluated the amount of gingival retraction width and the depth of the finish line. In this study, the measurement limits of the subgingival finish line using an IOS and models fabricated by a 3D printer were investigated. The results of this study revealed that TRIOS3 could not measure the finish line when the gingival retraction width was <0.25 mm, and the finish line was located >0.50 mm below the gingival margin.

Dental Materials JournalVol. 44(6)
Otemae College (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of the influence of gingival retraction width on the optical impression of the subgingival region using a 3D printed abutment tooth model — Shoichi Ishigaki, Takahiro Nishiyama, et al. · Dental Materials Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS