Comparative analysis of silt, kaolinite, and montmorillonite particle effects on bio-cementation in sandy soils

Efficiency of microbiologically induced carbonate precipitation (MICP), an eco-friendly ground improvement method, relies heavily on soil composition, particularly the type and percentage of fine particles. Past research has predominantly focused on pure sands, with limited studies on the effects of a single type of fine, mainly silt or kaolinite clay, in spherical particle sands. Consequently, there remains a lack of fundamental knowledge regarding how different fines impact MICP differently. This study addresses this gap through a novel comparative analysis of the impacts of silt, kaolinite, and montmorillonite on MICP in two sands with spherical and angular particles. Laboratory column tests were performed on sands containing 0%, 2.5%, and 7.5% fines. All fines (up to 7.5%) improved the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of MICP-treated samples. Silt achieved the most uniform cementation and highest UCS increase (∼7 times). Kaolinite was the least effective, causing the highest bio-cement heterogeneity. The mode of cementation—whether contact or surface—was primarily governed by the host sand properties when fine content was low (≤2.5%), but was influenced by fines’ characteristics in addition to characteristics of the host sand at higher fines content. Findings reveal that a greater cement content does not guarantee higher strength in MICP-treated sandy soils, highlighting the critical role of fines properties and other governing factors in strength development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2025-0750
Primary Topic
Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of silt, kaolinite, and montmorillonite particle effects on bio-cementation in sandy soils

Kamelia Atefi‐Monfared, Ronak Mehrabi
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements
article

Comparative analysis of silt, kaolinite, and montmorillonite particle effects on bio-cementation in sandy soils

Kamelia Atefi‐Monfared, Ronak Mehrabi
article en

Abstract

Efficiency of microbiologically induced carbonate precipitation (MICP), an eco-friendly ground improvement method, relies heavily on soil composition, particularly the type and percentage of fine particles. Past research has predominantly focused on pure sands, with limited studies on the effects of a single type of fine, mainly silt or kaolinite clay, in spherical particle sands. Consequently, there remains a lack of fundamental knowledge regarding how different fines impact MICP differently. This study addresses this gap through a novel comparative analysis of the impacts of silt, kaolinite, and montmorillonite on MICP in two sands with spherical and angular particles. Laboratory column tests were performed on sands containing 0%, 2.5%, and 7.5% fines. All fines (up to 7.5%) improved the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of MICP-treated samples. Silt achieved the most uniform cementation and highest UCS increase (∼7 times). Kaolinite was the least effective, causing the highest bio-cement heterogeneity. The mode of cementation—whether contact or surface—was primarily governed by the host sand properties when fine content was low (≤2.5%), but was influenced by fines’ characteristics in addition to characteristics of the host sand at higher fines content. Findings reveal that a greater cement content does not guarantee higher strength in MICP-treated sandy soils, highlighting the critical role of fines properties and other governing factors in strength development.

Canadian Geotechnical JournalVol. 62
Exponent (United States) (US), York University (CA), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.