Dissociating Spatial Attention and Working Memory Storage with Pupillometry

Extant work establishes a close relationship between spatial attention and working memory (WM) storage. Indeed, spatial representations of memorized items emerge spontaneously, even when space is completely task-irrelevant. Nevertheless, accumulating evidence suggests that the number of stored objects in WM can be tracked independently from the distribution of spatial attention, suggesting that these are separable aspects of attentional control. We examined this issue by analyzing pupillometric data from three change detection experiments (total n = 67) wherein the extent of spatial attention and WM load were manipulated independently. Results showed that pupil size tracked the number of attended locations and the number of memorized objects independently in each experiment. This dissociation held across distinct task designs and was present for both visuospatial and auditory WM. The current findings challenge unitary models of attention and instead demonstrate spatial attention and WM gating to be distinct aspects of voluntary attentional control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.a.2395
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dissociating Spatial Attention and Working Memory Storage with Pupillometry

Edward Awh, Stefan Van der Stigchel, Henry M. Jones, Damian Koevoet
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Dissociating Spatial Attention and Working Memory Storage with Pupillometry

Edward Awh, Stefan Van der Stigchel, Henry M. Jones, Damian Koevoet
article en

Abstract

Extant work establishes a close relationship between spatial attention and working memory (WM) storage. Indeed, spatial representations of memorized items emerge spontaneously, even when space is completely task-irrelevant. Nevertheless, accumulating evidence suggests that the number of stored objects in WM can be tracked independently from the distribution of spatial attention, suggesting that these are separable aspects of attentional control. We examined this issue by analyzing pupillometric data from three change detection experiments (total n = 67) wherein the extent of spatial attention and WM load were manipulated independently. Results showed that pupil size tracked the number of attended locations and the number of memorized objects independently in each experiment. This dissociation held across distinct task designs and was present for both visuospatial and auditory WM. The current findings challenge unitary models of attention and instead demonstrate spatial attention and WM gating to be distinct aspects of voluntary attentional control.

Journal of Cognitive NeuroscienceVol. 38(4)
Utrecht University (NL), University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dissociating Spatial Attention and Working Memory Storage with Pupillometry — Edward Awh, Stefan Van der Stigchel, et al. · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS