Axial Compression and Uplift Performance of Continuous Helix Screw Piles

This study investigates the axial performance of continuous helix screw piles compared to helical piles through full-scale compression and tension load testing in layered soils. Twenty-three piles were installed and tested. The results demonstrate that screw piles can achieve considerable axial capacity with lower installation torque than helical piles, particularly under tensile loading. The capacity-torque relationship for screw piles was more consistent across both compression and tension, likely due to reduced soil disturbance from the smaller helix projection. Strain gauge measurements indicated that screw piles act primarily as friction piles with the threaded shaft carrying most of the load, especially in stiff clay. On the other hand, the smooth portion of the pile shaft contributed only marginally to resistance in compression and none in tension. The calculated capacity based on theoretical equations aligned well with field results in compression, with screw piles best represented by cylindrical shear failure in sand and a combination of cylindrical shear and individual bearing failure in clay. However, there is greater variability between calculated and measured uplift capacity, possibly due to soil disturbance effects. Additionally, the commonly used helix spacing ratio (S/D) was found to be less applicable to screw piles in predicting failure mode due to their smaller shaft-to-helix diameter difference.