Collaborative intelligence in AI: Evaluating the performance of a council of AIs on the USMLE

The stochastic nature of next-token generation and resulting response variability in Large Language Models (LLMs) outputs pose challenges in ensuring consistency and accuracy on knowledge assessments. This study introduces a novel multi-agent framework, referred to as a "Council of AIs", to enhance LLM performance through collaborative decision-making. The Council consists of multiple GPT-4 instances that iteratively discuss and reach consensus on answers facilitated by a designated "Facilitator AI." This methodology was applied to 325 United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) questions across all three exam stages: Step 1, focusing on biomedical sciences; Step 2 evaluating clinical knowledge (CK)\; and Step 3, evaluating readiness for independent medical practice. The Council achieved consensus that were correct 97%, 93%, and 94% of the time for Step 1, Step 2 CK, and Step 3, respectively, outperforming single-instance GPT-4 models. In cases where there wasn't an initial unanimous response, the Council deliberations achieved a consensus that was the correct answer 83% of the time, with the Council correcting over half (53%) of the responses that majority vote had gotten incorrect. The odds of a majority voting response changing from incorrect to correct were 5 (95% CI: 1.1, 22.8) times higher than the odds of changing from correct to incorrect after discussion. This study provides the first evidence that the semantic entropy of the response space can consistently be reduced to zero-demonstrated here through Council deliberation, and suggesting the possibility of other mechanisms to achieve the same outcome.. This study revealed that in a Council model, response variability, often considered a limitation, can be transformed into a strength that supports adaptive reasoning and collaborative refinement of answers. These findings suggest new paradigms for AI implementation and reveal the heightened strength that emerges when AIs begin to collaborate as a collective rather than operate alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Digital Health
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000787
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collaborative intelligence in AI: Evaluating the performance of a council of AIs on the USMLE

Elahe Nezami, Muzamillah Jeelani, Ashwini Niranjan‐Azadi, Shiv Gaglani et al.
1 citations
PLOS Digital Health
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Collaborative intelligence in AI: Evaluating the performance of a council of AIs on the USMLE

Elahe Nezami, Muzamillah Jeelani, Ashwini Niranjan‐Azadi, Shiv Gaglani, Michael Gibbons, Aamir Javaid, Saad Zafar, Minahil Cheema, Amanda Cross, R. A. Dixon, Yahya Shaikh, Denisa Livingston, Morgan Cheatham, Tauhid Mahmud, Zishan K. Siddiqui, Zainab Asiyah Jeelani-Shaikh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The stochastic nature of next-token generation and resulting response variability in Large Language Models (LLMs) outputs pose challenges in ensuring consistency and accuracy on knowledge assessments. This study introduces a novel multi-agent framework, referred to as a "Council of AIs", to enhance LLM performance through collaborative decision-making. The Council consists of multiple GPT-4 instances that iteratively discuss and reach consensus on answers facilitated by a designated "Facilitator AI." This methodology was applied to 325 United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) questions across all three exam stages: Step 1, focusing on biomedical sciences; Step 2 evaluating clinical knowledge (CK)\; and Step 3, evaluating readiness for independent medical practice. The Council achieved consensus that were correct 97%, 93%, and 94% of the time for Step 1, Step 2 CK, and Step 3, respectively, outperforming single-instance GPT-4 models. In cases where there wasn't an initial unanimous response, the Council deliberations achieved a consensus that was the correct answer 83% of the time, with the Council correcting over half (53%) of the responses that majority vote had gotten incorrect. The odds of a majority voting response changing from incorrect to correct were 5 (95% CI: 1.1, 22.8) times higher than the odds of changing from correct to incorrect after discussion. This study provides the first evidence that the semantic entropy of the response space can consistently be reduced to zero-demonstrated here through Council deliberation, and suggesting the possibility of other mechanisms to achieve the same outcome.. This study revealed that in a Council model, response variability, often considered a limitation, can be transformed into a strength that supports adaptive reasoning and collaborative refinement of answers. These findings suggest new paradigms for AI implementation and reveal the heightened strength that emerges when AIs begin to collaborate as a collective rather than operate alone.

PLOS Digital HealthVol. 4(10)
Florida Institute of Technology (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Boston Children's Hospital (US), Texas Department of State Health Services (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Miami (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Riphah International University (PK), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), International Islamic University Malaysia (MY), Stony Brook School (US), Mental Health America of Oregon (US), Navajo Nation Division of Health (US), Film Independent (US), Greyston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.