Bridge Structural Health Monitoring: A Multi-Dimensional Taxonomy and Evaluation of Anomaly Detection Methods

Bridges are critical to national mobility and economic flow, making dependable structural health monitoring (SHM) systems essential for safety and durability. However, the SHM data quality is often affected by sensor faults, transmission noise, and environmental interference. To address these issues, anomaly detection methods are widely adopted. Despite their wide use and variety, there is a lack of systematic evaluation that comprehensively compares these techniques. Existing reviews are often constrained by limited scope, minimal comparative synthesis, and insufficient focus on real-time performance and multivariate analysis. Consequently, this systematic literature review (SLR) analyzes 36 peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025, sourced from eight reputable databases. Unlike prior reviews, this work presents a novel four-dimensional taxonomy covering real-time capability, multivariate support, analysis domain, and detection methods. Moreover, detection methods are further classified into three categories: distance-based, predictive, and image processing. A comparative evaluation of the reviewed detection methods is performed across five key dimensions: robustness, scalability, real-world deployment feasibility, interpretability, and data dependency. Findings reveal that image-processing methods are the most frequently applied (22 studies), providing high detection accuracy but facing scalability challenges due to computational intensity. Predictive models offer a trade-off between interpretability and performance, whereas distance-based methods remain less common due to their sensitivity to dimensionality and environmental factors. Notably, only 11 studies support real-time anomaly detection, and multivariate analysis is often overlooked. Moreover, time-domain signal processing dominates the field, while frequency and time-frequency domain methods remain rare despite their potential. Finally, this review highlights key challenges such as scalability, interpretability, robustness, and practicality of current models. Further research should focus on developing adaptive and interpretable anomaly detection frameworks that are efficient enough for real-world SHM deployment. These models should combine multi-modal strategies, handle uncertainty, and follow standardized evaluation protocols across varied monitoring environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15193603
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridge Structural Health Monitoring: A Multi-Dimensional Taxonomy and Evaluation of Anomaly Detection Methods

Omar S. Sonbul, Muhammad Rashid
Buildings
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
article

Bridge Structural Health Monitoring: A Multi-Dimensional Taxonomy and Evaluation of Anomaly Detection Methods

Omar S. Sonbul, Muhammad Rashid
article en

Abstract

Bridges are critical to national mobility and economic flow, making dependable structural health monitoring (SHM) systems essential for safety and durability. However, the SHM data quality is often affected by sensor faults, transmission noise, and environmental interference. To address these issues, anomaly detection methods are widely adopted. Despite their wide use and variety, there is a lack of systematic evaluation that comprehensively compares these techniques. Existing reviews are often constrained by limited scope, minimal comparative synthesis, and insufficient focus on real-time performance and multivariate analysis. Consequently, this systematic literature review (SLR) analyzes 36 peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025, sourced from eight reputable databases. Unlike prior reviews, this work presents a novel four-dimensional taxonomy covering real-time capability, multivariate support, analysis domain, and detection methods. Moreover, detection methods are further classified into three categories: distance-based, predictive, and image processing. A comparative evaluation of the reviewed detection methods is performed across five key dimensions: robustness, scalability, real-world deployment feasibility, interpretability, and data dependency. Findings reveal that image-processing methods are the most frequently applied (22 studies), providing high detection accuracy but facing scalability challenges due to computational intensity. Predictive models offer a trade-off between interpretability and performance, whereas distance-based methods remain less common due to their sensitivity to dimensionality and environmental factors. Notably, only 11 studies support real-time anomaly detection, and multivariate analysis is often overlooked. Moreover, time-domain signal processing dominates the field, while frequency and time-frequency domain methods remain rare despite their potential. Finally, this review highlights key challenges such as scalability, interpretability, robustness, and practicality of current models. Further research should focus on developing adaptive and interpretable anomaly detection frameworks that are efficient enough for real-world SHM deployment. These models should combine multi-modal strategies, handle uncertainty, and follow standardized evaluation protocols across varied monitoring environments.

BuildingsVol. 15(19)
Umm al-Qura University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.