Characterization of Self‐Administered Olfactory Assessments Novel Olfactory Sorting Task ( <scp>NOST</scp> ) and Odor Dilution Sorting ( <scp>ODS</scp> ) in a Community‐Based Population

ABSTRACT Objectives Olfactory evaluation beyond conventional domain testing may inform how olfactory impairment presents among the general population. Recently reported assessments based on odor matching (NOST) and intensity sorting (ODS) may provide additional insight into olfactory function. Characterizing performance of these simple and self‐administered tasks among a community‐based population offers a valuable benchmark for subsequent evaluation in aging and cognition‐impaired cohorts. Methods Seventy community‐based individuals completed Sniffin' Sticks TDI testing, NOST, and ODS. NOST is an odor matching task among twelve pairs of odorants, and ODS is an odor intensity scaling task. Scores were compared to TDI using Spearman correlations and Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests. Results NOST median score was 6 (IQR: 4, 9) while ODS was 0.80 (0.70, 0.85). NOST correlated with TDI (r; [confidence interval]: 0.640, [0.47, 0.76]), threshold (0.342; [0.11, 0.54]), discrimination (0.556; [0.36, 0.70]), and identification (0.297, [0.06, 0.50]), but not with ODS. Participants performed significantly better on the ODS–Eugenol trial than on the ODS–PEA trial, with median scores of 0.90 (IQR: 0.80, 1.0) and 0.70 (0.50, 0.80), respectively ( p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions NOST correlates strongly with odor discrimination in this community‐based population, while ODS shows no significant correlations with any TDI subdomains. The lack of several strong correlations on either assessment with overall TDI suggests these assessments may evaluate domains of smell and cognition not previously captured by standalone TDI testing. Continued validation of NOST and ODS across a broad population with ranging olfactory and cognitive statuses is needed to fully characterize the utility of these well‐tolerated, self‐administered olfactory tests. Level of Evidence 2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Laryngoscope
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.70190
Primary Topic
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterization of Self‐Administered Olfactory Assessments Novel Olfactory Sorting Task ( NOST ) and Odor Dilution Sorting ( ODS ) in a Community‐Based Population

Jonathan B. Overdevest, Renjie Zhang, Jeffrey N. Motter, Davangere P. Devanand et al.
The Laryngoscope
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
article

Characterization of Self‐Administered Olfactory Assessments Novel Olfactory Sorting Task ( NOST ) and Odor Dilution Sorting ( ODS ) in a Community‐Based Population

Jonathan B. Overdevest, Renjie Zhang, Jeffrey N. Motter, Davangere P. Devanand, Matthew D. A. Spence, Tiana M. Saak
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives Olfactory evaluation beyond conventional domain testing may inform how olfactory impairment presents among the general population. Recently reported assessments based on odor matching (NOST) and intensity sorting (ODS) may provide additional insight into olfactory function. Characterizing performance of these simple and self‐administered tasks among a community‐based population offers a valuable benchmark for subsequent evaluation in aging and cognition‐impaired cohorts. Methods Seventy community‐based individuals completed Sniffin' Sticks TDI testing, NOST, and ODS. NOST is an odor matching task among twelve pairs of odorants, and ODS is an odor intensity scaling task. Scores were compared to TDI using Spearman correlations and Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests. Results NOST median score was 6 (IQR: 4, 9) while ODS was 0.80 (0.70, 0.85). NOST correlated with TDI (r; [confidence interval]: 0.640, [0.47, 0.76]), threshold (0.342; [0.11, 0.54]), discrimination (0.556; [0.36, 0.70]), and identification (0.297, [0.06, 0.50]), but not with ODS. Participants performed significantly better on the ODS–Eugenol trial than on the ODS–PEA trial, with median scores of 0.90 (IQR: 0.80, 1.0) and 0.70 (0.50, 0.80), respectively ( p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions NOST correlates strongly with odor discrimination in this community‐based population, while ODS shows no significant correlations with any TDI subdomains. The lack of several strong correlations on either assessment with overall TDI suggests these assessments may evaluate domains of smell and cognition not previously captured by standalone TDI testing. Continued validation of NOST and ODS across a broad population with ranging olfactory and cognitive statuses is needed to fully characterize the utility of these well‐tolerated, self‐administered olfactory tests. Level of Evidence 2.

The LaryngoscopeVol. 136(3)
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Texas Health Dallas (US), New York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute (US), New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.