A Guide to Build (ING) Generalised Linear Mixed Model Trees in Canadian Maritime English: Part 1, Social Factors

ABSTRACT This two‐part guide/research report introduces the Generalised Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) tree analysis technique to variationist sociolinguistics using (ING) variation in Canadian Maritime English (CME) as a test case. GLMM tree analysis combines the advantages of tree‐based recursive partitioning with the ability to include random effects in statistical modelling. In this, Part 1, the GLMM tree technique reveals a more nuanced pattern for age, gender, and education effects on variation between [ɪn] and standard [ɪŋ] for (ING) than simple mixed‐effect regression modelling alone. Linguistic constraints on (ING) variation in this data, as well as the GLMM tree analysis's merits for testing (multi‐)collinear predictors are explored in Part 2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language and Linguistics Compass
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.70020
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Guide to Build (ING) Generalised Linear Mixed Model Trees in Canadian Maritime English: Part 1, Social Factors

Matt Hunt Gardner
1 citations
Language and Linguistics Compass
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
6.13
article

A Guide to Build (ING) Generalised Linear Mixed Model Trees in Canadian Maritime English: Part 1, Social Factors

Matt Hunt Gardner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This two‐part guide/research report introduces the Generalised Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) tree analysis technique to variationist sociolinguistics using (ING) variation in Canadian Maritime English (CME) as a test case. GLMM tree analysis combines the advantages of tree‐based recursive partitioning with the ability to include random effects in statistical modelling. In this, Part 1, the GLMM tree technique reveals a more nuanced pattern for age, gender, and education effects on variation between [ɪn] and standard [ɪŋ] for (ING) than simple mixed‐effect regression modelling alone. Linguistic constraints on (ING) variation in this data, as well as the GLMM tree analysis's merits for testing (multi‐)collinear predictors are explored in Part 2.

Language and Linguistics CompassVol. 19(6)
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
6.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Guide to Build (ING) Generalised Linear Mixed Model Trees in Canadian Maritime English: Part 1, Social Factors — Matt Hunt Gardner · Language and Linguistics Compass (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS