The legal status of the human embryo through the prism of consent agreements for cryopreservation and storage of embryos

The development of assisted reproductive technologies has significantly intensified a long-standing and multifaceted dispute concerning the legal and ethical nature of the human embryo. The diversity of perspectives within academic and professional discourse stems from two key factors: the absence of a clear legal definition of embryo status in Russian legislation, and the ethical uncertainty surrounding attempts to categorize the embryo either as a subject or an object within the framework of legal relationships. As part of this study, a comprehensive analysis was conducted of current Russian legislation, judicial practice, and doctrinal views expressed by experts in both the legal and medical fields. Particular attention was paid to the actual practice of law enforcement, namely the analysis of civil law contracts for cryopreservation and storage of embryos, which are publicly accessible through the official websites of medical institutions offering ART procedures. The review of relevant court decisions revealed that such contracts are generally recognized by the courts as valid legal instruments. This indicates that they are not seen as violating the fundamental principles of public order or morality, and the courts consistently refer to the contractual terms when making legal decisions in related disputes. The study also explored in detail the grounds for embryo cryopreservation as outlined in these contracts, including financial obligations, the duration of embryo storage, legal grounds for termination of the contract, and liability for breaches of storage conditions. Analysis of courts’ decisions confirmed that Russian courts place significant weight on the specific terms agreed upon by the parties, as well as the distinctive legal and practical features of ART, including the potential use of cryopreserved biological material. During the research, the author came to the conclusion that, in view of current Russian legislation and practice, the human embryo in Russia actually has the status of the legal object limited in turnover with a minimum set of characteristics of the subject of law. This reflects a complex balance between ethical, medical, and legal considerations surrounding the status of embryos.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21128/1812-7126-2025-3-76-88
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The legal status of the human embryo through the prism of consent agreements for cryopreservation and storage of embryos

Anastasiya Iamshanova
Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

The legal status of the human embryo through the prism of consent agreements for cryopreservation and storage of embryos

Anastasiya Iamshanova
article en

Abstract

The development of assisted reproductive technologies has significantly intensified a long-standing and multifaceted dispute concerning the legal and ethical nature of the human embryo. The diversity of perspectives within academic and professional discourse stems from two key factors: the absence of a clear legal definition of embryo status in Russian legislation, and the ethical uncertainty surrounding attempts to categorize the embryo either as a subject or an object within the framework of legal relationships. As part of this study, a comprehensive analysis was conducted of current Russian legislation, judicial practice, and doctrinal views expressed by experts in both the legal and medical fields. Particular attention was paid to the actual practice of law enforcement, namely the analysis of civil law contracts for cryopreservation and storage of embryos, which are publicly accessible through the official websites of medical institutions offering ART procedures. The review of relevant court decisions revealed that such contracts are generally recognized by the courts as valid legal instruments. This indicates that they are not seen as violating the fundamental principles of public order or morality, and the courts consistently refer to the contractual terms when making legal decisions in related disputes. The study also explored in detail the grounds for embryo cryopreservation as outlined in these contracts, including financial obligations, the duration of embryo storage, legal grounds for termination of the contract, and liability for breaches of storage conditions. Analysis of courts’ decisions confirmed that Russian courts place significant weight on the specific terms agreed upon by the parties, as well as the distinctive legal and practical features of ART, including the potential use of cryopreserved biological material. During the research, the author came to the conclusion that, in view of current Russian legislation and practice, the human embryo in Russia actually has the status of the legal object limited in turnover with a minimum set of characteristics of the subject of law. This reflects a complex balance between ethical, medical, and legal considerations surrounding the status of embryos.

Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenieVol. 34(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The legal status of the human embryo through the prism of consent agreements for cryopreservation and storage of embryos — Anastasiya Iamshanova · Sravnitel noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS