Diversity Matters: Perceived Inclusion and Discrimination by Brazilian Tech Professionals

Diversity and inclusion are widely recognized as essential drivers of innovation in software engineering. However, systemic inequalities and implicit biases remain persistent challenges. This study aims to explore how tech professionals in Brazil perceive inclusion, discrimination, and unconscious bias in the workplace. We surveyed 220 tech professionals, focusing on experiences of bias, perceptions of fairness, and the influence of organizational setting. The findings reveal that 95.2% of women experienced sexism, compared to 70.3% of men; 77.1% of non-white professionals identify racism as a key issue, while 61.5% of disabled professionals report experiencing ableism. Hybrid work models were associated with the highest reports of sexism (80%), while employees at smaller companies reported more frequent instances of ableism than those at larger ones. Despite widespread acknowledgment of discrimination, only 23% of respondents explicitly recognized the presence of unconscious bias in themselves. While most see their teams as diverse, leadership inclusion lags, especially for disabled (25.9%) and neurodivergent (36.4%) professionals. These results reveal persistent equity gaps and call for DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) strategies in Brazil’s tech sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5753/sbes.2025.9956
Primary Topic
Gender and Technology in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diversity Matters: Perceived Inclusion and Discrimination by Brazilian Tech Professionals

Jessica Ribas, Juliana Alves Pereira, Larissa Rocha Soares, Anderson Uchôa et al.
Gender and Technology in Education
article

Diversity Matters: Perceived Inclusion and Discrimination by Brazilian Tech Professionals

Jessica Ribas, Juliana Alves Pereira, Larissa Rocha Soares, Anderson Uchôa, Theo Sousa, Júlia Azevedo
article en

Abstract

Diversity and inclusion are widely recognized as essential drivers of innovation in software engineering. However, systemic inequalities and implicit biases remain persistent challenges. This study aims to explore how tech professionals in Brazil perceive inclusion, discrimination, and unconscious bias in the workplace. We surveyed 220 tech professionals, focusing on experiences of bias, perceptions of fairness, and the influence of organizational setting. The findings reveal that 95.2% of women experienced sexism, compared to 70.3% of men; 77.1% of non-white professionals identify racism as a key issue, while 61.5% of disabled professionals report experiencing ableism. Hybrid work models were associated with the highest reports of sexism (80%), while employees at smaller companies reported more frequent instances of ableism than those at larger ones. Despite widespread acknowledgment of discrimination, only 23% of respondents explicitly recognized the presence of unconscious bias in themselves. While most see their teams as diverse, leadership inclusion lags, especially for disabled (25.9%) and neurodivergent (36.4%) professionals. These results reveal persistent equity gaps and call for DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) strategies in Brazil’s tech sector.

Universidade do Estado da Bahia (BR), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (BR), United Food and Commercial Workers (US)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Gender and Technology in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.