Remarques terminologiques et méthodologiques en marge des recherches sur une communauté immigrée/émigrée. Les points de vue d’un pays d’origine et d’un pays d’accueil (l’exemple des Polonais en France)

The aim of this paper is to analyze the content and meaning of selected terms employed in the research on the history of immigration that may create misunderstandings between researchers from various countries. For this study the example of the Polish immigrants living in France is used. The studied issues are following: 1) difference between terms “Polish community”, “Polish ethnic group” and “Polonia”, 2) distinction between terms “assimilation” and “integration”, 3) misunderstandings in the meaning of terms “nation” and “nationality”, 4) difference of perspectives between the “historiography of immigration” in a country of immigration and the “historiography of emigration” in a country of emigration. It is always important to well define the terms employed – sometimes without any reflection – in the historiography of immigration. Furthermore, such an effort is essential if any research work pretends to be of value beyond a one-sided national perspective and beyond a single national historiography.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prace Historyczne
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4467/20844069ph.24.044.21584
Primary Topic
French Language Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remarques terminologiques et méthodologiques en marge des recherches sur une communauté immigrée/émigrée. Les points de vue d’un pays d’origine et d’un pays d’accueil (l’exemple des Polonais en France)

Paweł Sękowski
Prace Historyczne
French Language Learning Methods
article

Remarques terminologiques et méthodologiques en marge des recherches sur une communauté immigrée/émigrée. Les points de vue d’un pays d’origine et d’un pays d’accueil (l’exemple des Polonais en France)

Paweł Sękowski
article en

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze the content and meaning of selected terms employed in the research on the history of immigration that may create misunderstandings between researchers from various countries. For this study the example of the Polish immigrants living in France is used. The studied issues are following: 1) difference between terms “Polish community”, “Polish ethnic group” and “Polonia”, 2) distinction between terms “assimilation” and “integration”, 3) misunderstandings in the meaning of terms “nation” and “nationality”, 4) difference of perspectives between the “historiography of immigration” in a country of immigration and the “historiography of emigration” in a country of emigration. It is always important to well define the terms employed – sometimes without any reflection – in the historiography of immigration. Furthermore, such an effort is essential if any research work pretends to be of value beyond a one-sided national perspective and beyond a single national historiography.

Prace HistoryczneVol. 151(1)
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
French Language Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.