Digital twins and IIoT: comparison of Prometheus and InfluxDB

This article presents a comparative analysis of data monitoring and visualization tools—Prometheus and InfluxDB—in the context of digital twins (DTs) applied to industrial settings. DTs optimize production processes using industrial internet of things (IIoT) technologies. Mathematical models assessed the tools based on response time, resource consumption, throughput, and reliability. Prometheus is better suited for high-frequency monitoring, achieving a response time of 0.01 seconds and processing up to 10,000 metrics per second—10–15% better than InfluxDB. It consumes 1.5 times less memory (100 MB versus 150 MB), making it faster and more resource-efficient. Conversely, InfluxDB excels in long-term storage and analytics, handling up to 8,000 metrics per second with a response time of 0.09 seconds. However, it requires more resources, including higher CPU usage (20% versus 15%). Both tools integrate seamlessly with Grafana for visualization, offering flexibility for real-time monitoring and decision-making. The study provides actionable insights for selecting monitoring systems based on project-specific requirements, highlighting Prometheus’s efficiency in dynamic scenarios and InfluxDB’s strength in analytics-focused tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v14i5.9687
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital twins and IIoT: comparison of Prometheus and InfluxDB

Gulnur Tyulepberdinova, Murat Kunelbayev, Bauyrzhan Amirkhanov, Gulshat Amirkhanova et al.
1 citations
Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
1.01
article

Digital twins and IIoT: comparison of Prometheus and InfluxDB

Gulnur Tyulepberdinova, Murat Kunelbayev, Bauyrzhan Amirkhanov, Gulshat Amirkhanova, Timur Ishmurzin, Azim Aidynuly
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of data monitoring and visualization tools—Prometheus and InfluxDB—in the context of digital twins (DTs) applied to industrial settings. DTs optimize production processes using industrial internet of things (IIoT) technologies. Mathematical models assessed the tools based on response time, resource consumption, throughput, and reliability. Prometheus is better suited for high-frequency monitoring, achieving a response time of 0.01 seconds and processing up to 10,000 metrics per second—10–15% better than InfluxDB. It consumes 1.5 times less memory (100 MB versus 150 MB), making it faster and more resource-efficient. Conversely, InfluxDB excels in long-term storage and analytics, handling up to 8,000 metrics per second with a response time of 0.09 seconds. However, it requires more resources, including higher CPU usage (20% versus 15%). Both tools integrate seamlessly with Grafana for visualization, offering flexibility for real-time monitoring and decision-making. The study provides actionable insights for selecting monitoring systems based on project-specific requirements, highlighting Prometheus’s efficiency in dynamic scenarios and InfluxDB’s strength in analytics-focused tasks.

Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and InformaticsVol. 14(5)
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.