Miraculous (mis)conception: Naming Mary’s reproductive choice

Traditional interpretations of the Annunciation emphasize the miraculous nature of Jesus’s conception with little attention to whether Mary even wanted to bear children. This article looks for traces of Mary’s reproductive choice in Luke’s gospel by re-reading Mary’s story from the social location of a woman who does not want to give birth. Drawing on feminist hermeneutics and personal experience, I begin by naming and making interpretive space for women who chose not to birth children. Second, I situate Mary within the broader historical context of women who resisted reproduction. Third, I question modern interpretive assumptions and reread Mary’s story, finding moments of reproductive choice in Mary’s response to Gabriel, her identification as a slave, her song of resistance, and her continued strife postpartum. Finally, I briefly explore another biblical woman who wished to refrain from childbirth to illustrate that Mary is not alone. This article concludes that the miraculous conception is ultimately an egregious (mis)conception. Mary is an unwilling participant in a divine reproductive plan that does not match her own.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review & Expositor
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00346373251383472
Primary Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Miraculous (mis)conception: Naming Mary’s reproductive choice

Anna M. V. Bowden
Review & Expositor
American Constitutional Law and Politics
article

Miraculous (mis)conception: Naming Mary’s reproductive choice

Anna M. V. Bowden
article en

Abstract

Traditional interpretations of the Annunciation emphasize the miraculous nature of Jesus’s conception with little attention to whether Mary even wanted to bear children. This article looks for traces of Mary’s reproductive choice in Luke’s gospel by re-reading Mary’s story from the social location of a woman who does not want to give birth. Drawing on feminist hermeneutics and personal experience, I begin by naming and making interpretive space for women who chose not to birth children. Second, I situate Mary within the broader historical context of women who resisted reproduction. Third, I question modern interpretive assumptions and reread Mary’s story, finding moments of reproductive choice in Mary’s response to Gabriel, her identification as a slave, her song of resistance, and her continued strife postpartum. Finally, I briefly explore another biblical woman who wished to refrain from childbirth to illustrate that Mary is not alone. This article concludes that the miraculous conception is ultimately an egregious (mis)conception. Mary is an unwilling participant in a divine reproductive plan that does not match her own.

Review & ExpositorVol. 122(1-2)
Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
American Constitutional Law and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Miraculous (mis)conception: Naming Mary’s reproductive choice — Anna M. V. Bowden · Review & Expositor (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS