Establishing Physician-Governed Social Media Accreditation to Combat the Spread of Misinformation by Non-Medical Skinfluencers

INTRODUCTION Social media has become a prevailing force in shaping dermatology-related behaviors, where visually appealing content lends itself to mass digital engagement. The emergence of “skinfluencers,” or social media personalities who offer skincare advice or endorse dermatologic products, has given rise to a parallel ecosystem of dermatologic information that is often unregulated, commercialized, and devoid of clinical oversight. Although some skinfluencers offer practical insights based on personal experience, many lack any formal medical training, raising concerns about the reliability of the information being circulated. Surveys consistently show that patients use the internet as the first source for dermatologic guidance [1].

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dermis.
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35702/derm.10049
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishing Physician-Governed Social Media Accreditation to Combat the Spread of Misinformation by Non-Medical Skinfluencers

Alina G. Bridges, Olumayowa Adebiyi, Kelly Frasier, Nicole Werpachowski et al.
Dermis.
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Establishing Physician-Governed Social Media Accreditation to Combat the Spread of Misinformation by Non-Medical Skinfluencers

Alina G. Bridges, Olumayowa Adebiyi, Kelly Frasier, Nicole Werpachowski, Grace Herrick, Kenneth A. Smith, Neena Edupuganti, Avva Saniee
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Social media has become a prevailing force in shaping dermatology-related behaviors, where visually appealing content lends itself to mass digital engagement. The emergence of “skinfluencers,” or social media personalities who offer skincare advice or endorse dermatologic products, has given rise to a parallel ecosystem of dermatologic information that is often unregulated, commercialized, and devoid of clinical oversight. Although some skinfluencers offer practical insights based on personal experience, many lack any formal medical training, raising concerns about the reliability of the information being circulated. Surveys consistently show that patients use the internet as the first source for dermatologic guidance [1].

Dermis.Vol. 5(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Establishing Physician-Governed Social Media Accreditation to Combat the Spread of Misinformation by Non-Medical Skinfluencers — Alina G. Bridges, Olumayowa Adebiyi, et al. · Dermis. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS