A Large Scale Population Survey of Health and Wellbeing to Allow Comparisons Between Outcome Measures: the SIPHER-HWMIC Dataset

Abstract This paper presents a large scale cross-section survey of health and wellbeing that allows econometric mapping between different outcome measures. The Systems science In Public Health and Health Economics Research - Health and Wellbeing Multi-Instrument Comparison (SIPHER-HWMIC) is a cross-sectional individual-level survey conducted in the United Kingdom, of over 12,000 members of the general public aged 18 + . It includes a wide range of self-reported questions in health and wellbeing taken from established outcome instruments such as the EQ-5D-5L, Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), ICECAP-A, EQ Health and Wellbeing Short (EQ-HWB-S), etc., alongside work-related and housing-related questions, and socioeconomic covariates including age, gender, education, personal income, etc. The data were collected through three separate commercial internet panels in November 2022, and oversampled respondents from Scotland. To demonstrate the potential uses of the dataset, the paper also reports on the results of an econometric mapping analysis between Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS) and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12v2) Mental Component Summary. The SIPHER-HWMIC dataset is available from the UK Data Service (SN9458).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Indicators Research
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-025-03728-1
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Large Scale Population Survey of Health and Wellbeing to Allow Comparisons Between Outcome Measures: the SIPHER-HWMIC Dataset

Aki Tsuchiya, Nyantara Wickramasekera
Social Indicators Research
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

A Large Scale Population Survey of Health and Wellbeing to Allow Comparisons Between Outcome Measures: the SIPHER-HWMIC Dataset

Aki Tsuchiya, Nyantara Wickramasekera
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a large scale cross-section survey of health and wellbeing that allows econometric mapping between different outcome measures. The Systems science In Public Health and Health Economics Research - Health and Wellbeing Multi-Instrument Comparison (SIPHER-HWMIC) is a cross-sectional individual-level survey conducted in the United Kingdom, of over 12,000 members of the general public aged 18 + . It includes a wide range of self-reported questions in health and wellbeing taken from established outcome instruments such as the EQ-5D-5L, Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), ICECAP-A, EQ Health and Wellbeing Short (EQ-HWB-S), etc., alongside work-related and housing-related questions, and socioeconomic covariates including age, gender, education, personal income, etc. The data were collected through three separate commercial internet panels in November 2022, and oversampled respondents from Scotland. To demonstrate the potential uses of the dataset, the paper also reports on the results of an econometric mapping analysis between Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS) and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12v2) Mental Component Summary. The SIPHER-HWMIC dataset is available from the UK Data Service (SN9458).

Social Indicators ResearchVol. 180(3)
University of Sheffield (GB)
Cancer Research UK, British Heart Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.