The relationship between experienced losses and damages, risk tolerance and livelihood thresholds in the East Gippsland, Australia, farming sector

Losses and damages are residual impacts of climate change that occur despite mitigation and adaptation actions. Losses and damages are borderless, albeit experienced differently between and within countries. Although Australia is a high-income country, recent losses and damages have been particularly severe. Over the last eight years, farmers in East Gippsland, Victoria, have been severely affected by a prolonged drought, bushfires, and floods, with evidence emerging of the links between these events and anthropogenic climate change. Through a series of surveys and semi-structured interviews with farmers and agricultural governance actors in East Gippsland, this research explores the relationship between experienced losses and damages, risk tolerance and livelihood thresholds. East Gippsland farmers are undertaking adaptation, but are still experiencing significant economic and non-economic losses and damages. Farmers and sectoral governance actors portray a complex picture of high risk tolerance, which, together with livelihoods strongly linked to identities, values, and self-worth, translates into a low desire to leave the sector despite escalating losses and damages that are challenging livelihood viability. We suggest that farmers’ high risk tolerance may, at present, with limited structural adaptation action identified, be unsustainable in light of current and future climate change. However, the strong values associated with being a farmer and the apparent recognition of greater adaptation needs across scales provide a potentially conducive environment for change. Whether farmers choose to stay or leave the sector, there must be managed processes to enable people to decide without losing their dignity and incurring further losses and damages. • East Gippsland farmers are experiencing significant climate-related losses and damages. • Both climatic and non-climatic processes influence risk tolerance and livelihood thresholds. • Livelihoods are strongly linked to identities, values, and self-worth. • Values associated with being a farmer increase risk tolerance and thresholds. • Whether farmers choose to stay or leave the sector, greater support is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103918
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Farm Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The relationship between experienced losses and damages, risk tolerance and livelihood thresholds in the East Gippsland, Australia, farming sector

Brian C. Chaffin, Guy Jackson, Emily Boyd
Journal of Rural Studies
Agriculture and Farm Safety
article

The relationship between experienced losses and damages, risk tolerance and livelihood thresholds in the East Gippsland, Australia, farming sector

Brian C. Chaffin, Guy Jackson, Emily Boyd
article en

Abstract

Losses and damages are residual impacts of climate change that occur despite mitigation and adaptation actions. Losses and damages are borderless, albeit experienced differently between and within countries. Although Australia is a high-income country, recent losses and damages have been particularly severe. Over the last eight years, farmers in East Gippsland, Victoria, have been severely affected by a prolonged drought, bushfires, and floods, with evidence emerging of the links between these events and anthropogenic climate change. Through a series of surveys and semi-structured interviews with farmers and agricultural governance actors in East Gippsland, this research explores the relationship between experienced losses and damages, risk tolerance and livelihood thresholds. East Gippsland farmers are undertaking adaptation, but are still experiencing significant economic and non-economic losses and damages. Farmers and sectoral governance actors portray a complex picture of high risk tolerance, which, together with livelihoods strongly linked to identities, values, and self-worth, translates into a low desire to leave the sector despite escalating losses and damages that are challenging livelihood viability. We suggest that farmers’ high risk tolerance may, at present, with limited structural adaptation action identified, be unsustainable in light of current and future climate change. However, the strong values associated with being a farmer and the apparent recognition of greater adaptation needs across scales provide a potentially conducive environment for change. Whether farmers choose to stay or leave the sector, there must be managed processes to enable people to decide without losing their dignity and incurring further losses and damages. • East Gippsland farmers are experiencing significant climate-related losses and damages. • Both climatic and non-climatic processes influence risk tolerance and livelihood thresholds. • Livelihoods are strongly linked to identities, values, and self-worth. • Values associated with being a farmer increase risk tolerance and thresholds. • Whether farmers choose to stay or leave the sector, greater support is needed.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 121
Lund University (SE), Northumbria University (GB), University of Montana (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Agriculture and Farm Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.