Homoeopathy in the lens of science: Bridging paradigms

Homoeopathy, a system of therapeutics established by Dr. Samuel Hahnemann over two centuries ago, continues to be one of the most debated and researched domains of complementary and alternative medicine. While widely practiced across Europe, Asia, and America, its position within mainstream biomedical discourse remains contentious, primarily due to its fundamental principles of potentization, ultra-dilution, and individualized prescribing. Scientificity—the adherence to principles of systematic inquiry, reproducibility, rationality, and evidence—provides a useful framework for examining Homoeopathy. This article critically explores the scientific foundations of Homoeopathy, the philosophical and epistemological roots of its principles, the challenges it faces in validation within conventional biomedical paradigms, and emerging research trends that lend credibility to its claims. By bridging traditional practice with contemporary scientific methodologies, Homoeopathy can strengthen its evidence base, foster interdisciplinary collaboration, and assert its relevance in integrative healthcare.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Homoeopathic Sciences
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/26164485.2025.v9.i4.c.1899
Primary Topic
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Homoeopathy in the lens of science: Bridging paradigms

Shweta Tushar Patil
International Journal of Homoeopathic Sciences
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
article

Homoeopathy in the lens of science: Bridging paradigms

Shweta Tushar Patil
article en

Abstract

Homoeopathy, a system of therapeutics established by Dr. Samuel Hahnemann over two centuries ago, continues to be one of the most debated and researched domains of complementary and alternative medicine. While widely practiced across Europe, Asia, and America, its position within mainstream biomedical discourse remains contentious, primarily due to its fundamental principles of potentization, ultra-dilution, and individualized prescribing. Scientificity—the adherence to principles of systematic inquiry, reproducibility, rationality, and evidence—provides a useful framework for examining Homoeopathy. This article critically explores the scientific foundations of Homoeopathy, the philosophical and epistemological roots of its principles, the challenges it faces in validation within conventional biomedical paradigms, and emerging research trends that lend credibility to its claims. By bridging traditional practice with contemporary scientific methodologies, Homoeopathy can strengthen its evidence base, foster interdisciplinary collaboration, and assert its relevance in integrative healthcare.

International Journal of Homoeopathic SciencesVol. 9(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.