Measuring public’s risk acceptability of urban underground space in China: a planned behaviour approach

Research on the public’s risk acceptability of urban underground space is scarce under the halo of development achievements of urban underground space. This research combines the psychological cognition paradigm and risk characteristics to construct a model and scale for the public’s risk acceptability of urban underground space in the Chinese context based on the theory of planned behaviour. We empirically analyse the realistic level and discuss planning strategies for future urban underground space. The results show that the public’s risk acceptability of urban underground space can be measured using 14 items and four dimensions: benefit perception, fairness and trust, public participation, and technological acceptance. All four dimensions show significant positive correlations with risk acceptability. Some demographic characteristics show significant differences in risk acceptability and dimensions. The Chinese public’s risk acceptability of urban underground space has a significantly positive spatial autocorrelation. The risk acceptability score has a spatial distribution similar to that of the per capita GDP. These findings preliminarily elucidate the public’s cognitive mechanism and characteristics of the risk acceptability and can provide a decision-making reference for government and urban planning departments to harmoniously develop urban underground space.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2025.2569855
Primary Topic
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring public’s risk acceptability of urban underground space in China: a planned behaviour approach

Yao Lü, Yongbao Zhang, Yongzhong Sha
Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
article

Measuring public’s risk acceptability of urban underground space in China: a planned behaviour approach

Yao Lü, Yongbao Zhang, Yongzhong Sha
article en

Abstract

Research on the public’s risk acceptability of urban underground space is scarce under the halo of development achievements of urban underground space. This research combines the psychological cognition paradigm and risk characteristics to construct a model and scale for the public’s risk acceptability of urban underground space in the Chinese context based on the theory of planned behaviour. We empirically analyse the realistic level and discuss planning strategies for future urban underground space. The results show that the public’s risk acceptability of urban underground space can be measured using 14 items and four dimensions: benefit perception, fairness and trust, public participation, and technological acceptance. All four dimensions show significant positive correlations with risk acceptability. Some demographic characteristics show significant differences in risk acceptability and dimensions. The Chinese public’s risk acceptability of urban underground space has a significantly positive spatial autocorrelation. The risk acceptability score has a spatial distribution similar to that of the per capita GDP. These findings preliminarily elucidate the public’s cognitive mechanism and characteristics of the risk acceptability and can provide a decision-making reference for government and urban planning departments to harmoniously develop urban underground space.

Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering
Civil Aviation Management Institute of China (CN), Lanzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.