Equity and Epistemic Justice of English-Medium Instruction in the Middle East and North Africa: A Critical Realism Perspective

Higher institutions of learning are dominated by the English language. This paper interrogates equity and epistemic justice posed by the dominance of English-medium instruction in educational institutions. It argues that the processes of internationalisation and globalisation work in complicity with neocolonialism, perpetuating the subjugation of local languages and barring access to knowledge for the majority. The underpinning arguments are based on the realities of six Middle Eastern institutions of higher learning and six in Africa. The study is contextualised in the educational policy transformation imperatives that adopt English-medium instruction. The paper has adopted critical realism in order to highlight the epistemic injustice and linguistic inequality resulting from the hegemony of the English language. Uncritical adoption of the English language perpetuates injustices suffered by the users of other languages. The paper highlights epistemic access challenges in the context of knowledge economies. The main argument is that English-medium instruction is responsible for the troubles of epistemic access because it serves the aspirations of the minority elite at the expense of the majority.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Research for Social Change
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17159/2221-4070/v14n2a20
Primary Topic
Second Language Learning and Teaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equity and Epistemic Justice of English-Medium Instruction in the Middle East and North Africa: A Critical Realism Perspective

Berrington Ntombela
Educational Research for Social Change
Second Language Learning and Teaching
article

Equity and Epistemic Justice of English-Medium Instruction in the Middle East and North Africa: A Critical Realism Perspective

Berrington Ntombela
article en

Abstract

Higher institutions of learning are dominated by the English language. This paper interrogates equity and epistemic justice posed by the dominance of English-medium instruction in educational institutions. It argues that the processes of internationalisation and globalisation work in complicity with neocolonialism, perpetuating the subjugation of local languages and barring access to knowledge for the majority. The underpinning arguments are based on the realities of six Middle Eastern institutions of higher learning and six in Africa. The study is contextualised in the educational policy transformation imperatives that adopt English-medium instruction. The paper has adopted critical realism in order to highlight the epistemic injustice and linguistic inequality resulting from the hegemony of the English language. Uncritical adoption of the English language perpetuates injustices suffered by the users of other languages. The paper highlights epistemic access challenges in the context of knowledge economies. The main argument is that English-medium instruction is responsible for the troubles of epistemic access because it serves the aspirations of the minority elite at the expense of the majority.

Educational Research for Social ChangeVol. 14(2)
University of Limpopo (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Second Language Learning and Teaching
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Equity and Epistemic Justice of English-Medium Instruction in the Middle East and North Africa: A Critical Realism Perspective — Berrington Ntombela · Educational Research for Social Change (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS