Environmental impact of computer-aided diagnosis in colonoscopy: a carbon footprint assessment of a prospective study cohort

The environmental impact of computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) in colonoscopy is unknown. The potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by limiting unnecessary polypectomies may be offset by emissions associated with CADx devices. We quantified and compared the carbon footprint of colonoscopy with and without CADx.Life-cycle carbon emissions associated with endoscopic snares, polyp traps, histopathology, and CADx devices were estimated using life-cycle assessment software. The effect of CADx was estimated by the carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions related to outcomes from a prospective cohort of patients who underwent colonoscopy with optical diagnosis under a leave-in-situ strategy (i.e. rectosigmoid polyps ≤5 mm predicted as non-neoplastic were not removed) with and without CADx assistance.We analyzed 1134 individuals (median age 67 years, 59% male) with 1716 colorectal polyps. Colonoscopy with CADx reduced the number of snares and polyp traps from 567 to 543 (difference: 24) and histopathology submissions from 1343 to 1278 (difference: 65). However, the total carbon footprint increased from 832 kg CO2e (95%CI 815 to 847) without CADx to 946 kg CO2e (95%CI 927 to 965) with CADx, corresponding to an absolute increase of 114 kg CO2e (95%CI 80 to 150) or 0.10 kg CO2e per colonoscopy.Using CADx under a leave-in-situ strategy increased the environmental burden of colonoscopy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2717-8365
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental impact of computer-aided diagnosis in colonoscopy: a carbon footprint assessment of a prospective study cohort

Amyn Haji, Ishita Barua, Jens Aksel Nilsen, Magnus Løberg et al.
Endoscopy
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
article

Environmental impact of computer-aided diagnosis in colonoscopy: a carbon footprint assessment of a prospective study cohort

Amyn Haji, Ishita Barua, Jens Aksel Nilsen, Magnus Løberg, Øyvind Holme, Kensaku Mori, Natalie Halvorsen, Olaolu Olabintan, Michael Bretthauer, Masashi Misawa, Robin Baddeley, Svein Oskar Frigstad, Claire Hunt, Mette Kalager, Bu Hayee, Toyoki Kudo, James E. East, Yuichi Mori, Shraddha Gulati, Amit Rastogi, Cesare Hassan
article en

Abstract

The environmental impact of computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) in colonoscopy is unknown. The potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by limiting unnecessary polypectomies may be offset by emissions associated with CADx devices. We quantified and compared the carbon footprint of colonoscopy with and without CADx.Life-cycle carbon emissions associated with endoscopic snares, polyp traps, histopathology, and CADx devices were estimated using life-cycle assessment software. The effect of CADx was estimated by the carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions related to outcomes from a prospective cohort of patients who underwent colonoscopy with optical diagnosis under a leave-in-situ strategy (i.e. rectosigmoid polyps ≤5 mm predicted as non-neoplastic were not removed) with and without CADx assistance.We analyzed 1134 individuals (median age 67 years, 59% male) with 1716 colorectal polyps. Colonoscopy with CADx reduced the number of snares and polyp traps from 567 to 543 (difference: 24) and histopathology submissions from 1343 to 1278 (difference: 65). However, the total carbon footprint increased from 832 kg CO2e (95%CI 815 to 847) without CADx to 946 kg CO2e (95%CI 927 to 965) with CADx, corresponding to an absolute increase of 114 kg CO2e (95%CI 80 to 150) or 0.10 kg CO2e per colonoscopy.Using CADx under a leave-in-situ strategy increased the environmental burden of colonoscopy.

EndoscopyVol. 58(03)
Oslo University Hospital (NO), Humanitas University (IT), King's College London (GB), University of Oslo (NO), Veterans Health Administration (US), Vestre Viken Hospital Trust (NO), American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (US), John Radcliffe Hospital (GB), SHOWA Medical University Northern Yokohama Hospital (JP), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), Oxford BioMedica (United Kingdom) (GB), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), King's College Hospital (GB), St Mark's Hospital (GB), Sørlandet Sykehus (NO), Imperial College London (GB), Nagoya University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.