xFAIR: A Multi-Layer Approach to Data FAIRness Assessment and Data FAIRification

The FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data principles are crucial for data discoverability, sharing, and exploitation across diverse contexts, where evaluating data FAIRness reliably is essential for quality assessment and continuous improvement of data assets. Organizations can identify issues, implement targeted enhancements, and increase data value and trustworthiness by leveraging actionable insights bluefrom systematic data FAIRness assessment. However, this often requires heterogeneous metrics and guidelines, particularly when domain-specific challenges are involved. To bridge the gap between theoretical FAIR principles and their practical implementation, this article introduces xFAIR, a multi-layer platform architecture for assessing and enhancing data FAIRness, and for achieving data FAIRification in multiple domains. xFAIR incorporates modules for data acquisition, FAIRness evaluation, and ontology support. Its versatility is demonstrated via three real-world use cases: i. improving open data portals for Public Administrations, ii. extending FAIR assessment to multi-level European data portals, and iii. tackling metadata quality in news media by applying FAIR data principles to examine how source trustworthiness and metadata richness are linked. Each use case highlights specific aspects (e.g., domain-dependent metadata validation, or trust scores integration) to enhance quality assurance. Additional components support user feedback and media literacy. The obtained research outcomes underscore the importance of combining automated metadata validation with community-driven refinements, to achieve higher data quality and foster ongoing FAIRification actions across domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Data and Information Quality
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3769113
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

xFAIR: A Multi-Layer Approach to Data FAIRness Assessment and Data FAIRification

A Caló, Antonella Longo, Marco Zappatore, Davide Damiano Colella et al.
1 citations
Journal of Data and Information Quality
Research Data Management Practices
3.25
article

xFAIR: A Multi-Layer Approach to Data FAIRness Assessment and Data FAIRification

A Caló, Antonella Longo, Marco Zappatore, Davide Damiano Colella, Francesca Zampino
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data principles are crucial for data discoverability, sharing, and exploitation across diverse contexts, where evaluating data FAIRness reliably is essential for quality assessment and continuous improvement of data assets. Organizations can identify issues, implement targeted enhancements, and increase data value and trustworthiness by leveraging actionable insights bluefrom systematic data FAIRness assessment. However, this often requires heterogeneous metrics and guidelines, particularly when domain-specific challenges are involved. To bridge the gap between theoretical FAIR principles and their practical implementation, this article introduces xFAIR, a multi-layer platform architecture for assessing and enhancing data FAIRness, and for achieving data FAIRification in multiple domains. xFAIR incorporates modules for data acquisition, FAIRness evaluation, and ontology support. Its versatility is demonstrated via three real-world use cases: i. improving open data portals for Public Administrations, ii. extending FAIR assessment to multi-level European data portals, and iii. tackling metadata quality in news media by applying FAIR data principles to examine how source trustworthiness and metadata richness are linked. Each use case highlights specific aspects (e.g., domain-dependent metadata validation, or trust scores integration) to enhance quality assurance. Additional components support user feedback and media literacy. The obtained research outcomes underscore the importance of combining automated metadata validation with community-driven refinements, to achieve higher data quality and foster ongoing FAIRification actions across domains.

Journal of Data and Information QualityVol. 17(4)
University of Salento (IT), Pawsey Supercomputing Research Centre (AU), Innovation Engineering (Italy) (IT), Society for Personality and Social Psychology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Research Data Management Practices
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.