Transdiagnostic psychopathology dimensions and cognitive functioning after traumatic brain injury: An application of the HiTOP-TBI model

Background: Psychopathology and cognitive impairment are common consequences of moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), but their interrelationships remain poorly understood. Clarifying these relationships is important for understanding how cognitive functioning may contribute to post-TBI psychopathology and for informing targeted, holistic assessment and treatment strategies. Traditional categorical approaches to psychiatric diagnosis have produced inconsistent results, potentially due to limitations in capturing the complexity of post-TBI psychopathology. The recently developed Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Following TBI (HiTOP-TBI) model, a transdiagnostic dimensional framework, was applied to examine associations between psychopathology and cognitive functioning. Methods: Ninety-nine participants with moderate-severe TBI (mean age 50.86 years; 72% male) completed self-report psychopathology questionnaires and performance-based cognitive tasks. Linear regressions examined associations between ten hierarchically organised HiTOP-TBI dimensions (one general factor, two broad internalizing and externalizing spectra, seven lower-order factors) and cognitive measures, with false discovery rate correction applied. Results: After correction, higher scores (indicating greater psychopathology) on the HiTOP-TBI dimensions of Externalizing Problems, Rigid Constraint, and Self-Harm and Psychoticism were associated with poorer performance on the verbal encoding task. Higher scores on Rigid Constraint and Self-Harm and Psychoticism were also associated with lower scores in the episodic memory domain (encompassing both immediate and delayed recall). In comparison, General Problems, Internalizing Problems, Somatic Symptoms, Detachment, Compensatory and Phobic Reactions, Dysregulated Negative Emotionality, and Harmful Substance Use were not significantly associated with cognitive functioning after correction. Conclusions: Applying the transdiagnostic, dimensional HiTOP-TBI framework, we identified several associations between psychopathology and cognitive functioning after moderate-severe TBI, with verbal encoding and memory most consistently implicated, particularly within externalizing domains. These findings highlight the importance of holistic neuropsychological formulation and integrative interventions aimed at improving both emotional and cognitive outcomes in TBI and demonstrate the value of transdiagnostic approaches in neuropsychology research and practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jcs3t_v1
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transdiagnostic psychopathology dimensions and cognitive functioning after traumatic brain injury: An application of the HiTOP-TBI model

Jao-Yue Carminati, Kate Rachel Gould, Jai Jason Carmichael, Alexia Samiotis et al.
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Transdiagnostic psychopathology dimensions and cognitive functioning after traumatic brain injury: An application of the HiTOP-TBI model

Jao-Yue Carminati, Kate Rachel Gould, Jai Jason Carmichael, Alexia Samiotis, Amelia J. Hicks, Gershon Spitz, Jennie Louise Ponsford
article en

Abstract

Background: Psychopathology and cognitive impairment are common consequences of moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), but their interrelationships remain poorly understood. Clarifying these relationships is important for understanding how cognitive functioning may contribute to post-TBI psychopathology and for informing targeted, holistic assessment and treatment strategies. Traditional categorical approaches to psychiatric diagnosis have produced inconsistent results, potentially due to limitations in capturing the complexity of post-TBI psychopathology. The recently developed Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Following TBI (HiTOP-TBI) model, a transdiagnostic dimensional framework, was applied to examine associations between psychopathology and cognitive functioning. Methods: Ninety-nine participants with moderate-severe TBI (mean age 50.86 years; 72% male) completed self-report psychopathology questionnaires and performance-based cognitive tasks. Linear regressions examined associations between ten hierarchically organised HiTOP-TBI dimensions (one general factor, two broad internalizing and externalizing spectra, seven lower-order factors) and cognitive measures, with false discovery rate correction applied. Results: After correction, higher scores (indicating greater psychopathology) on the HiTOP-TBI dimensions of Externalizing Problems, Rigid Constraint, and Self-Harm and Psychoticism were associated with poorer performance on the verbal encoding task. Higher scores on Rigid Constraint and Self-Harm and Psychoticism were also associated with lower scores in the episodic memory domain (encompassing both immediate and delayed recall). In comparison, General Problems, Internalizing Problems, Somatic Symptoms, Detachment, Compensatory and Phobic Reactions, Dysregulated Negative Emotionality, and Harmful Substance Use were not significantly associated with cognitive functioning after correction. Conclusions: Applying the transdiagnostic, dimensional HiTOP-TBI framework, we identified several associations between psychopathology and cognitive functioning after moderate-severe TBI, with verbal encoding and memory most consistently implicated, particularly within externalizing domains. These findings highlight the importance of holistic neuropsychological formulation and integrative interventions aimed at improving both emotional and cognitive outcomes in TBI and demonstrate the value of transdiagnostic approaches in neuropsychology research and practice.

Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.