Evaluating the Performance of Regional and Global Forecasting Models for Accurate PM <sub>2.5</sub> Prediction and Air Quality Index Assessment in Delhi, India

Abstract Accurate forecasting of PM 2.5 (particulate matter ≤2.5 μm) is essential for effective air quality management, particularly in urban areas such as Delhi, which frequently experience severe pollution episodes. This study evaluates the predictive capabilities of regional and global forecasting models for PM 2.5 concentrations and the associated Air Quality Index (AQI) in Delhi, India. A multi‐model assessment was conducted using three regional models (WRF‐Chem, SILAM, and DM‐Chem) and four global models (IFS, GEOS‐FP, GEFS‐Aerosols, and the machine learning‐based GEOS‐ML). Forecasts from these models were validated against hourly in situ measurements from 39 Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) stations in Delhi. Results revealed that the Air Quality Early Warning System (AQEWS) based on WRF‐Chem exhibited the highest predictive accuracy (Performance Index, PI = 87), with minimal deviations from observations. The GEOS‐ML model (PI = 70) effectively captured key variations using a machine learning approach. DM‐Chem (330 m: PI = 69, 1.5 km: PI = 61) showed reasonable agreement, whereas IFS (PI = 60), GEOS‐FP (PI = 52), and GEFS‐Aerosols (PI = 47) captured broader trends with varying accuracy. SILAM (PI = 58) exhibited notable discrepancies during high‐pollution events. This study underscores the need for rigorous evaluation of forecasting systems to enhance air quality prediction in polluted urban environments such as Delhi. Identifying the most reliable models supports data‐driven decision‐making for air pollution mitigation and public health protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jd043719
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Performance of Regional and Global Forecasting Models for Accurate PM 2.5 Prediction and Air Quality Index Assessment in Delhi, India

Pawan Gupta, Rajesh Kumar, Chinmay Jena, Shweta Bhati et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
article

Evaluating the Performance of Regional and Global Forecasting Models for Accurate PM 2.5 Prediction and Air Quality Index Assessment in Delhi, India

Pawan Gupta, Rajesh Kumar, Chinmay Jena, Shweta Bhati, Partha S. Bhattacharjee, A. Jayakumar, Kamaljit Ray, Vijay Kumar Soni, Alqamah Sayeed, Gayatri Kalita, T. J. Anurose, Sreyashi Debnath, Gaurav Rajabhau Govardhan, Prafull P. Yadav, Johannes Flemming, Junhyeon Seo, Rajmal Jat, Sachin Dinkar Ghude, Sudhir Kumar Atri
article en

Abstract

Abstract Accurate forecasting of PM 2.5 (particulate matter ≤2.5 μm) is essential for effective air quality management, particularly in urban areas such as Delhi, which frequently experience severe pollution episodes. This study evaluates the predictive capabilities of regional and global forecasting models for PM 2.5 concentrations and the associated Air Quality Index (AQI) in Delhi, India. A multi‐model assessment was conducted using three regional models (WRF‐Chem, SILAM, and DM‐Chem) and four global models (IFS, GEOS‐FP, GEFS‐Aerosols, and the machine learning‐based GEOS‐ML). Forecasts from these models were validated against hourly in situ measurements from 39 Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) stations in Delhi. Results revealed that the Air Quality Early Warning System (AQEWS) based on WRF‐Chem exhibited the highest predictive accuracy (Performance Index, PI = 87), with minimal deviations from observations. The GEOS‐ML model (PI = 70) effectively captured key variations using a machine learning approach. DM‐Chem (330 m: PI = 69, 1.5 km: PI = 61) showed reasonable agreement, whereas IFS (PI = 60), GEOS‐FP (PI = 52), and GEFS‐Aerosols (PI = 47) captured broader trends with varying accuracy. SILAM (PI = 58) exhibited notable discrepancies during high‐pollution events. This study underscores the need for rigorous evaluation of forecasting systems to enhance air quality prediction in polluted urban environments such as Delhi. Identifying the most reliable models supports data‐driven decision‐making for air pollution mitigation and public health protection.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 130(19)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), U.S. National Science Foundation (US), National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (IN), Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology (IN), European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (GB), University Grants Commission (IN), India Meteorological Department (IN), Ministry of Earth Sciences (IN), Morgan State University (US), Savitribai Phule Pune University (IN), Science Applications International Corporation (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.