The construction and validation of the AI mindset scale (AIMS)

As the dawn of artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes our future, a better understanding of the individual beliefs and attitudes toward AI becomes pivotal in harnessing its full potential. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate the AI Mindset Scale (AIMS), assessing the belief that AI usage enhances one's abilities and skills. The German sample ( N = 921; 58% female; M age = 30.90; SD age = 8.71 years), was randomly split into two subsamples for EFA ( n = 368) and CFA ( n = 553). EFA resulted in a two-factor solution with four items per factor. CFA supported the model fit of the hierarchical model, including an AIMS total score and the subscales growth and non-deskilling (CFI = .982; TLI = .973; RMSEA = .072; SRMR = .043), showing good reliability (total score, α = .82; ω = .91; growth, α = .91; ω = .92; non-deskilling, α = .91; ω = .92). The nomological network analysis revealed that the AIMS captures distinct facets, with growth primarily predicted by AI acceptance and openness, and non-deskilling primarily by AI fear and locus of control. • The AIMS measures the belief of the enhancing or deskilling effect of AI use. • The instrument comprises two subscales: Growth and Non-deskilling. • The 8-item scale shows high reliability and a clean latent structure. • AI fear, acceptance, and openness predict the AIMS total score. • The economic scale is applicable in psychology and human-AI interaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100220
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The construction and validation of the AI mindset scale (AIMS)

Johann‐Christoph Münscher, Philipp Yorck Herzberg, Fabio Ibrahim, Nils-Torge Telle
1 citations
Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

The construction and validation of the AI mindset scale (AIMS)

Johann‐Christoph Münscher, Philipp Yorck Herzberg, Fabio Ibrahim, Nils-Torge Telle
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As the dawn of artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes our future, a better understanding of the individual beliefs and attitudes toward AI becomes pivotal in harnessing its full potential. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate the AI Mindset Scale (AIMS), assessing the belief that AI usage enhances one's abilities and skills. The German sample ( N = 921; 58% female; M age = 30.90; SD age = 8.71 years), was randomly split into two subsamples for EFA ( n = 368) and CFA ( n = 553). EFA resulted in a two-factor solution with four items per factor. CFA supported the model fit of the hierarchical model, including an AIMS total score and the subscales growth and non-deskilling (CFI = .982; TLI = .973; RMSEA = .072; SRMR = .043), showing good reliability (total score, α = .82; ω = .91; growth, α = .91; ω = .92; non-deskilling, α = .91; ω = .92). The nomological network analysis revealed that the AIMS captures distinct facets, with growth primarily predicted by AI acceptance and openness, and non-deskilling primarily by AI fear and locus of control. • The AIMS measures the belief of the enhancing or deskilling effect of AI use. • The instrument comprises two subscales: Growth and Non-deskilling. • The 8-item scale shows high reliability and a clean latent structure. • AI fear, acceptance, and openness predict the AIMS total score. • The economic scale is applicable in psychology and human-AI interaction.

Computers in Human Behavior Artificial HumansVol. 6
Helmut Schmidt University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.