Real Assets and Subjective Well-Being: Using a Novel Measure for Relative Effects

Abstract This paper examines the relationship between household real assets and life satisfaction in Slovakia, using microdata from the 2017 wave of the Household Finance and Consumption Survey (HFCS). We find a robust positive association between the value of real assets and life satisfaction. To assess whether this relationship is driven by relative, rather than purely absolute, effects, we make use of a unique feature of the Slovak HFCS: interviewer paradata. Specifically, we use interviewers’ assessments of the respondent’s dwelling quality relative to that of nearby homes. These paradata provide a new locally grounded reference point for evaluating positional effects – arguably with greater validity than conventional approaches based on arbitrarily defined comparison groups. We show that real assets function as positional goods, with downward comparisons exerting a stronger influence on well-being than upward ones. We estimate that approximately 7% of the total relationship between real assets and life satisfaction can be attributed to relative concerns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Indicators Research
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-025-03717-4
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real Assets and Subjective Well-Being: Using a Novel Measure for Relative Effects

Andrej Cupák, Zuzana Brokešová, Marian Rizov, Anthony Lepinteur
Social Indicators Research
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
article

Real Assets and Subjective Well-Being: Using a Novel Measure for Relative Effects

Andrej Cupák, Zuzana Brokešová, Marian Rizov, Anthony Lepinteur
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the relationship between household real assets and life satisfaction in Slovakia, using microdata from the 2017 wave of the Household Finance and Consumption Survey (HFCS). We find a robust positive association between the value of real assets and life satisfaction. To assess whether this relationship is driven by relative, rather than purely absolute, effects, we make use of a unique feature of the Slovak HFCS: interviewer paradata. Specifically, we use interviewers’ assessments of the respondent’s dwelling quality relative to that of nearby homes. These paradata provide a new locally grounded reference point for evaluating positional effects – arguably with greater validity than conventional approaches based on arbitrarily defined comparison groups. We show that real assets function as positional goods, with downward comparisons exerting a stronger influence on well-being than upward ones. We estimate that approximately 7% of the total relationship between real assets and life satisfaction can be attributed to relative concerns.

Social Indicators ResearchVol. 180(3)
Molde University College (NO), University of Luxembourg (LU), National Bank of Slovakia (SK), Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LU), Bratislava University of Economics and Business (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Real Assets and Subjective Well-Being: Using a Novel Measure for Relative Effects — Andrej Cupák, Zuzana Brokešová, et al. · Social Indicators Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS