Perspectives for Best Practices in Boron‐Based CO <sub>2</sub> Reconstruction

Abstract Since atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) is a key driver of global temperatures over geological time, determining past CO 2 and fluxes among Earth's carbon reservoirs is critical in resolving drivers and feedbacks within Earth's climate system. Such CO 2 reconstructions are challenging prior to ice core records of the last 800 kyrs, and yet it is beyond this time where the most promising analogs for our warmer, higher CO 2 future lie. Amongst proxies for past CO 2 reconstruction, boron isotopes (δ 11 B, primarily measured in foraminiferal carbonate) have become one of the most well‐established, having demonstrated their ability to replicate atmospheric CO 2 during periods where ice core estimates are available for comparison. Although analytical reproducibility across laboratories has greatly improved in recent years, the approaches taken to derive CO 2 estimates from these boron isotope measurements remain variable. For example, there are significant inconsistencies in how seawater temperature, boron isotope, and elemental composition are estimated, in how a second carbonate system parameter is used to constrain the carbonate system, in how ecophysiological imprints on proxy signals are accounted for, and in how uncertainties are quantified and propagated. The need to better harmonize practices in the community motivated a series of virtual workshops and a PAGES‐supported meeting, and ultimately this AGU Special Collection “Advances and Best Practices in Boron‐based Paleo‐CO 2 Reconstruction.” In this synthesis article, we briefly summarize the history of approaches to address these issues, current limitations and strengths of the proxy, and highlight some important points to consider when applying the boron isotope proxy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024pa005057
Primary Topic
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives for Best Practices in Boron‐Based CO 2 Reconstruction

Kuo‐Fang Huang, Thomas B. Chalk, Eleni Anagnostou, Tali L. Babila et al.
Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
article

Perspectives for Best Practices in Boron‐Based CO 2 Reconstruction

Kuo‐Fang Huang, Thomas B. Chalk, Eleni Anagnostou, Tali L. Babila, Hana Jurikova, Michael J. Henehan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Since atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) is a key driver of global temperatures over geological time, determining past CO 2 and fluxes among Earth's carbon reservoirs is critical in resolving drivers and feedbacks within Earth's climate system. Such CO 2 reconstructions are challenging prior to ice core records of the last 800 kyrs, and yet it is beyond this time where the most promising analogs for our warmer, higher CO 2 future lie. Amongst proxies for past CO 2 reconstruction, boron isotopes (δ 11 B, primarily measured in foraminiferal carbonate) have become one of the most well‐established, having demonstrated their ability to replicate atmospheric CO 2 during periods where ice core estimates are available for comparison. Although analytical reproducibility across laboratories has greatly improved in recent years, the approaches taken to derive CO 2 estimates from these boron isotope measurements remain variable. For example, there are significant inconsistencies in how seawater temperature, boron isotope, and elemental composition are estimated, in how a second carbonate system parameter is used to constrain the carbonate system, in how ecophysiological imprints on proxy signals are accounted for, and in how uncertainties are quantified and propagated. The need to better harmonize practices in the community motivated a series of virtual workshops and a PAGES‐supported meeting, and ultimately this AGU Special Collection “Advances and Best Practices in Boron‐based Paleo‐CO 2 Reconstruction.” In this synthesis article, we briefly summarize the history of approaches to address these issues, current limitations and strengths of the proxy, and highlight some important points to consider when applying the boron isotope proxy.

Paleoceanography and PaleoclimatologyVol. 40(10)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of St Andrews (GB), GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (DE), University of Bristol (GB), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Centre de Recherche et d’Enseignement de Géosciences de l’Environnement (FR), Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia Sinica (TW), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.