Caregivers’ Emotional Responses Triggered by a False-Positive VLCADD in Newborn Screening in Oita Prefecture

Neonatal screening programs for inborn errors of metabolism are essential for early diagnosis and intervention. However, false-positive results can cause unnecessary psychological stress for caregivers. This study investigated the emotional impact on a small number of caregivers in Oita Prefecture in Japan, whose infants received false-positive screening results for very long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (VLCADD). Particular attention was given to caregivers' concerns regarding episodes of transient fasting suggestive of nutritional deficiency, as well as their perspectives on appropriate feeding practices for newborns. Nineteen infants in Oita Prefecture were identified as having elevated acylcarnitines, which were later confirmed as false positives. Of these cases, 11 mothers consented to participate in a survey and long-term growth evaluation using health check records. Thirty children with normal screening results were included as controls. While no differences in physical growth were found between groups by 3.5 years of age, some mothers of false-positive infants reported persistent anxiety. Their concerns included regret for inadequate breastfeeding and latent adverse effects on long-term growth or development. Conversely, caregivers' anxiety diminished over time as they directly observed their infants' normal growth and development. No regret was expressed regarding breastfeeding, and concerns about VLDCAD were not observed. Caregivers' responses may help reduce their psychological burden.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11040090
Primary Topic
Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Caregivers’ Emotional Responses Triggered by a False-Positive VLCADD in Newborn Screening in Oita Prefecture

Yumi Shimada, Kenji Ihara, Sakura Morishima
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
article

Caregivers’ Emotional Responses Triggered by a False-Positive VLCADD in Newborn Screening in Oita Prefecture

Yumi Shimada, Kenji Ihara, Sakura Morishima
article en

Abstract

Neonatal screening programs for inborn errors of metabolism are essential for early diagnosis and intervention. However, false-positive results can cause unnecessary psychological stress for caregivers. This study investigated the emotional impact on a small number of caregivers in Oita Prefecture in Japan, whose infants received false-positive screening results for very long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (VLCADD). Particular attention was given to caregivers' concerns regarding episodes of transient fasting suggestive of nutritional deficiency, as well as their perspectives on appropriate feeding practices for newborns. Nineteen infants in Oita Prefecture were identified as having elevated acylcarnitines, which were later confirmed as false positives. Of these cases, 11 mothers consented to participate in a survey and long-term growth evaluation using health check records. Thirty children with normal screening results were included as controls. While no differences in physical growth were found between groups by 3.5 years of age, some mothers of false-positive infants reported persistent anxiety. Their concerns included regret for inadequate breastfeeding and latent adverse effects on long-term growth or development. Conversely, caregivers' anxiety diminished over time as they directly observed their infants' normal growth and development. No regret was expressed regarding breastfeeding, and concerns about VLDCAD were not observed. Caregivers' responses may help reduce their psychological burden.

International Journal of Neonatal ScreeningVol. 11(4)
Oita University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.