Evaluating Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Elements Containing Macro-Synthetic Fibers and Traditional Steel Reinforcement

This study investigates the shear behavior of concrete elements reinforced with both traditional steel reinforcement and macro-synthetic fibers, with an emphasis on evaluating the predictive capabilities of current shear design provisions. A review of available experimental data, involving 52 beams and 8 panel specimens, revealed limitations in both quantity and consistency, hindering the formulation of robust design recommendations. To address this, an extensive parametric numerical study was conducted using the VecTor2 nonlinear finite element program, incorporating a recently developed modeling approach for PFRC shear response. A total of 288 simulations were carried out to explore the influence of fiber content, transverse reinforcement ratio, and concrete compressive strength, particularly in ranges not previously captured by experimental programs. The performance of existing design codes, including ACI, CSA, EC2, AASHTO, and the Fib Model Code, was assessed against both experimental data and the enriched parametric dataset. The Fib Model Code demonstrated the most reliable and consistent predictions, maintaining close alignment with reference strengths across all fiber contents, reinforcement ratios, and concrete strengths. AASHTO provisions performed moderately well, showing generally conservative and stable predictions, though some underestimation occurred for beams with higher shear reinforcement. In contrast, ACI and CSA models were consistently conservative, especially at higher concrete strengths, potentially leading to uneconomical designs. EC2 models exhibited the highest variability and least reliability, particularly in the presence of fibers, indicating limited applicability without modification. The results highlight that most conventional codes do not fully account for the synergistic action between fibers and transverse steel reinforcement, and that their reliability deteriorates for high-strength PFRC. These findings have practical implications for the design of PFRC elements, suggesting that the Fib Model Code may be the most suitable for current applications, whereas other provisions may require recalibration or modification. Future research should focus on expanding experimental datasets and developing unified design models that explicitly consider fiber–steel interactions, concrete strength, and fiber distribution.