Comparison Of Electrocautery Incision With Scalpel Incision In Midline Abdominal Surgeries At Baghdad Teaching Hospital.

Background: The surgical use of electrocautery in skin incision dates back to the early 20th century. Although electrocautery use has the potential to decrease scalpel use, which is a common cause of surgeon injuries; skin incision using diathermy has been widely controversial due to concerns regarding wound infection. Aim of study: To compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between scalpel and electrocautery in midline laparotomy. Patients and methods: This is a cross sectional study that included 100 patients who underwent midline laparotomy and was conducted in the 2nd floor of Baghdad Teaching Hospital/ Medical city, Baghdad. The data was collected from the 1st of April 2022 to the 31st of December 2022. Patients were observed concerning intraoperative blood loss, incision time, postoperative pain, and wound infection. Results: Intraoperative blood loss and pain scores on postoperative day 1 were significantly lower in the electrocautery group, while no significant difference between the two groups was detected regarding incision speed, rate of wound infection, and pain scores on postoperative days 2, 3, 4, and 5. Conclusion: Based on the current findings, it can be concluded that electrocautery is a safe procedure that is to a reduction in intraoperative blood loss and postoperative pain on day 1st day.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Biomedical Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53555/ajbr.v28i4s.8484
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Of Electrocautery Incision With Scalpel Incision In Midline Abdominal Surgeries At Baghdad Teaching Hospital.

Dr Tariq I. Al-Aubaidi, Dr Waleed Abdul Hussein Salman, Dr Shams Jawad
African Journal of Biomedical Research
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Comparison Of Electrocautery Incision With Scalpel Incision In Midline Abdominal Surgeries At Baghdad Teaching Hospital.

Dr Tariq I. Al-Aubaidi, Dr Waleed Abdul Hussein Salman, Dr Shams Jawad
article en

Abstract

Background: The surgical use of electrocautery in skin incision dates back to the early 20th century. Although electrocautery use has the potential to decrease scalpel use, which is a common cause of surgeon injuries; skin incision using diathermy has been widely controversial due to concerns regarding wound infection. Aim of study: To compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between scalpel and electrocautery in midline laparotomy. Patients and methods: This is a cross sectional study that included 100 patients who underwent midline laparotomy and was conducted in the 2nd floor of Baghdad Teaching Hospital/ Medical city, Baghdad. The data was collected from the 1st of April 2022 to the 31st of December 2022. Patients were observed concerning intraoperative blood loss, incision time, postoperative pain, and wound infection. Results: Intraoperative blood loss and pain scores on postoperative day 1 were significantly lower in the electrocautery group, while no significant difference between the two groups was detected regarding incision speed, rate of wound infection, and pain scores on postoperative days 2, 3, 4, and 5. Conclusion: Based on the current findings, it can be concluded that electrocautery is a safe procedure that is to a reduction in intraoperative blood loss and postoperative pain on day 1st day.

African Journal of Biomedical Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.