Justice in the City

Today, more than half of the world's population lives in cities.This alone suggests that political philosophy, particularly theories of justice, should pay more attention to cities than it has hitherto.Following Wolff and de-Shalit (2024), we can list the main characteristics of the city: institutional authority over a territory and limited powers; high population density and plurality in the respective territory; a cultural-political identity distinct from national identity, and comprehensive opportunities needed to foster creativity and different ways of life.Due to all these characteristics, theories of justice designed for the state cannot simply be applied to the city.In this paper, I will focus on two very influential theories of egalitarian justice and attempt to determine how they can be adapted to the specific characteristics of the city.The first theory is John Rawls's justice as fairness, which includes the difference principle stating that economic and social inequalities are justified only if they maximize the benefit for the least advantaged compared to alternative arrangements.As this principle primarily concerns income and wealth, it is difficult to apply to the city because the distribution of income and wealth chiefly depends on the policies and laws of the state.Still, the city is responsible for providing many public services and distributing public goods.The difference principle needs to be modified to reflect the view that the situation of the least advantaged is not improved only through the distribution of material goods, but also the quality and accessibility of public services.The second theory is Martha Nussbaum's approach, based not on goods but on capabilities.In this case, justice requires the development of various capabilities affecting the well-being of city residents.In this context, Nussbaum's capability for affiliation is particularly important.At the city level, it involves a sense of place, the feeling that people can cultivate their various potentials in the city.The city is a more cohesive community than the state; due to higher population density, other people's actions affect our everyday lives much more directly.The sense of belonging in the city, as the sense of our place, is different from the sense of belonging in the country and requires different city policies toward both space and public services.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociologija i prostor
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5673/sip.63.1.7
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Justice in the City

Sociologija i prostor
Law in Society and Culture
article

Justice in the City

article en

Abstract

Today, more than half of the world's population lives in cities.This alone suggests that political philosophy, particularly theories of justice, should pay more attention to cities than it has hitherto.Following Wolff and de-Shalit (2024), we can list the main characteristics of the city: institutional authority over a territory and limited powers; high population density and plurality in the respective territory; a cultural-political identity distinct from national identity, and comprehensive opportunities needed to foster creativity and different ways of life.Due to all these characteristics, theories of justice designed for the state cannot simply be applied to the city.In this paper, I will focus on two very influential theories of egalitarian justice and attempt to determine how they can be adapted to the specific characteristics of the city.The first theory is John Rawls's justice as fairness, which includes the difference principle stating that economic and social inequalities are justified only if they maximize the benefit for the least advantaged compared to alternative arrangements.As this principle primarily concerns income and wealth, it is difficult to apply to the city because the distribution of income and wealth chiefly depends on the policies and laws of the state.Still, the city is responsible for providing many public services and distributing public goods.The difference principle needs to be modified to reflect the view that the situation of the least advantaged is not improved only through the distribution of material goods, but also the quality and accessibility of public services.The second theory is Martha Nussbaum's approach, based not on goods but on capabilities.In this case, justice requires the development of various capabilities affecting the well-being of city residents.In this context, Nussbaum's capability for affiliation is particularly important.At the city level, it involves a sense of place, the feeling that people can cultivate their various potentials in the city.The city is a more cohesive community than the state; due to higher population density, other people's actions affect our everyday lives much more directly.The sense of belonging in the city, as the sense of our place, is different from the sense of belonging in the country and requires different city policies toward both space and public services.

Sociologija i prostor
University of Rijeka (HR), Institut za filozofiju (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.