Life cycle assessment of various agrivoltaic systems across Europe

The deployment of conventional ground-mounted PV (CGMPV) systems on farmland creates intense land-use competition with agriculture. Agrivoltaic (APVs) systems present a promising solution, yet the environmental viability of different designs remains insufficiently understood, hindering their strategic deployment. This study addresses this gap by presenting the first life cycle assessment (LCA) benchmarking four bifacial APV systems, including fixed vertical, interspace, overhead single-axis, and overhead dual-axis systems with varying pitch spacings. These systems are compared against a bifacial CGMPV system (baseline scenario) and national electricity grid mixes, country-specific combinations of fossil, nuclear, and renewable sources, across north to south of Europe. A combined LCA method is applied, with attributional LCA evaluating PV components from cradle-to-end-of-use across ten impact categories, and a consequential approach addressing agricultural land-use change contributions to climate change category. Results demonstrate that APV systems significantly outperform national electricity grids across nine impact categories, achieving 8–111 times lower environmental impacts. The interspace single-axis system emerged as the most optimal configuration with the lowest greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions (11–20 g CO 2eq /kWh), 57 % lower particulate matter, 48 % lower acidification, and 27 % lower eutrophication versus other APVs. The overhead dual-axis system showed the highest impacts (16–29 g CO 2eq /kWh), driven primarily by steel consumption in mounting structures. Monte Carlo Analysis confirmed statistical significance. All APV systems showed 3.5–9.6 times higher mineral resource consumption than electricity grid mixes, highlighting a critical trade-off for sustainable resource management. These findings demonstrate that while APV systems can synergize food-energy systems with superior performance in most environmental categories, mineral resource intensity remains challenging, with material-efficient configurations essential for minimizing trade-offs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.10.003
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life cycle assessment of various agrivoltaic systems across Europe

Michele Colauzzi, Pietro Elia Campana, Michele Croci, Alessandro Agostini et al.
1 citations
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
0.80
article

Life cycle assessment of various agrivoltaic systems across Europe

Michele Colauzzi, Pietro Elia Campana, Michele Croci, Alessandro Agostini, Stefano Amaducci, Giorgio Impollonia, Sebastian Zainali, Amirhossein Nik Zad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The deployment of conventional ground-mounted PV (CGMPV) systems on farmland creates intense land-use competition with agriculture. Agrivoltaic (APVs) systems present a promising solution, yet the environmental viability of different designs remains insufficiently understood, hindering their strategic deployment. This study addresses this gap by presenting the first life cycle assessment (LCA) benchmarking four bifacial APV systems, including fixed vertical, interspace, overhead single-axis, and overhead dual-axis systems with varying pitch spacings. These systems are compared against a bifacial CGMPV system (baseline scenario) and national electricity grid mixes, country-specific combinations of fossil, nuclear, and renewable sources, across north to south of Europe. A combined LCA method is applied, with attributional LCA evaluating PV components from cradle-to-end-of-use across ten impact categories, and a consequential approach addressing agricultural land-use change contributions to climate change category. Results demonstrate that APV systems significantly outperform national electricity grids across nine impact categories, achieving 8–111 times lower environmental impacts. The interspace single-axis system emerged as the most optimal configuration with the lowest greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions (11–20 g CO 2eq /kWh), 57 % lower particulate matter, 48 % lower acidification, and 27 % lower eutrophication versus other APVs. The overhead dual-axis system showed the highest impacts (16–29 g CO 2eq /kWh), driven primarily by steel consumption in mounting structures. Monte Carlo Analysis confirmed statistical significance. All APV systems showed 3.5–9.6 times higher mineral resource consumption than electricity grid mixes, highlighting a critical trade-off for sustainable resource management. These findings demonstrate that while APV systems can synergize food-energy systems with superior performance in most environmental categories, mineral resource intensity remains challenging, with material-efficient configurations essential for minimizing trade-offs.

Sustainable Production and ConsumptionVol. 60
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (IT), Mälardalen University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.