Relative Contribution of Dermal Contact with Indoor Dust to Overall Human Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances

Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been quantified in household dust samples all over the world. This presents an exposure hazard via ingestion and dermal contact. Based on previously-reported bioaccessibility and bioavailability data, human dermal exposure to PFAS via dermal contact with indoor dust was estimated for the following six PFAS: C5-C8-perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs), plus C4 and C7-perfluorosulfonic acids (PFSAs). Exposure for people from five countries (Sweden, Japan, Canada, Australia and Norway) was estimated and compared for two age groups (adults and toddlers) under two exposure scenarios (summer and winter). S6PFAS exposure via dermal uptake from dust during summer ranged from 25–767 pg/kg bw/week and 91–2761 pg/kg bw/week for adults and toddlers, respectively. In general, dermal uptake of PFAS from dust was 10 times lower in winter than in summertime. Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) made the highest contribution to dermal exposure to S6PFAS in all countries except Norway, where PFOA > PFHxA. Dermal exposure to S6PFAS via dermal contact with dust was compared to published exposure estimates via inhalation, indoor dust ingestion, and diet for a cohort of Norwegian adults for which temporally-consistent exposure data were available. Of our target PFAS, dermal exposure of this cohort via contact with dust was greatest for PFOA (2.1 pg/kg bw/day in summer), followed by PFHxA (1.4 pg/kg bw/day in summer). In general, dermal contact with dust did not contribute substantially to overall human exposure to PFSAs, compared to PFCAs. For PFCAs, dermal exposure is a potentially important pathway, with dermal exposure to dust alone contributing to similar levels of exposure as indoor air inhalation for certain compounds. Consequently, this pathway should not be dismissed in future exposure assessments, especially if other sources of dermal exposure to PFAS, e.g., personal care products and fabrics, are considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Contamination Causes and Solutions
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53941/eccs.2025.100005
Primary Topic
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relative Contribution of Dermal Contact with Indoor Dust to Overall Human Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances

Mohamed Abou‐Elwafa Abdallah, Stuart Harrad, Oddný Ragnarsdóttir
Environmental Contamination Causes and Solutions
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
article

Relative Contribution of Dermal Contact with Indoor Dust to Overall Human Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances

Mohamed Abou‐Elwafa Abdallah, Stuart Harrad, Oddný Ragnarsdóttir
article en

Abstract

Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been quantified in household dust samples all over the world. This presents an exposure hazard via ingestion and dermal contact. Based on previously-reported bioaccessibility and bioavailability data, human dermal exposure to PFAS via dermal contact with indoor dust was estimated for the following six PFAS: C5-C8-perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs), plus C4 and C7-perfluorosulfonic acids (PFSAs). Exposure for people from five countries (Sweden, Japan, Canada, Australia and Norway) was estimated and compared for two age groups (adults and toddlers) under two exposure scenarios (summer and winter). S6PFAS exposure via dermal uptake from dust during summer ranged from 25–767 pg/kg bw/week and 91–2761 pg/kg bw/week for adults and toddlers, respectively. In general, dermal uptake of PFAS from dust was 10 times lower in winter than in summertime. Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) made the highest contribution to dermal exposure to S6PFAS in all countries except Norway, where PFOA > PFHxA. Dermal exposure to S6PFAS via dermal contact with dust was compared to published exposure estimates via inhalation, indoor dust ingestion, and diet for a cohort of Norwegian adults for which temporally-consistent exposure data were available. Of our target PFAS, dermal exposure of this cohort via contact with dust was greatest for PFOA (2.1 pg/kg bw/day in summer), followed by PFHxA (1.4 pg/kg bw/day in summer). In general, dermal contact with dust did not contribute substantially to overall human exposure to PFSAs, compared to PFCAs. For PFCAs, dermal exposure is a potentially important pathway, with dermal exposure to dust alone contributing to similar levels of exposure as indoor air inhalation for certain compounds. Consequently, this pathway should not be dismissed in future exposure assessments, especially if other sources of dermal exposure to PFAS, e.g., personal care products and fabrics, are considered.

Environmental Contamination Causes and SolutionsVol. 1(1)
University of Iceland (IS), University of Birmingham (GB)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.