Financial Executives’ Responses to the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Financial Reporting and Auditing

SUMMARY This article summarizes “How do financial executives respond to the use of artificial intelligence in financial reporting and auditing?” (Estep, Griffith, and MacKenzie 2024; hereafter EGM). EGM survey financial executives about their perceptions of AI in financial reporting and experimentally examines how they would incorporate AI-generated information when resolving proposed audit adjustments. EGM find that financial executives do not have negative perceptions of AI. Further, in a hypothetical scenario, they find that when a financial executive’s company uses AI to help prepare an accounting estimate, financial executives book larger audit adjustments if auditors use AI to audit the estimate than if auditors do not use AI. If a financial executive’s company does not use AI, auditors’ use of AI has minimal influence on financial executives’ decisions. This paper provides insights for practice based on EGM’s findings. JEL Classifications: M41; M42; O33.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Issues in Auditing
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-2025-014
Primary Topic
Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Financial Executives’ Responses to the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Financial Reporting and Auditing

Nikki L. MacKenzie, Cassandra Estep, Emily Elaine Griffith, Paige Csere
Current Issues in Auditing
Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
article

Financial Executives’ Responses to the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Financial Reporting and Auditing

Nikki L. MacKenzie, Cassandra Estep, Emily Elaine Griffith, Paige Csere
article en

Abstract

SUMMARY This article summarizes “How do financial executives respond to the use of artificial intelligence in financial reporting and auditing?” (Estep, Griffith, and MacKenzie 2024; hereafter EGM). EGM survey financial executives about their perceptions of AI in financial reporting and experimentally examines how they would incorporate AI-generated information when resolving proposed audit adjustments. EGM find that financial executives do not have negative perceptions of AI. Further, in a hypothetical scenario, they find that when a financial executive’s company uses AI to help prepare an accounting estimate, financial executives book larger audit adjustments if auditors use AI to audit the estimate than if auditors do not use AI. If a financial executive’s company does not use AI, auditors’ use of AI has minimal influence on financial executives’ decisions. This paper provides insights for practice based on EGM’s findings. JEL Classifications: M41; M42; O33.

Current Issues in Auditing
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Emory University (US), Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.