Fairer, healthier, and more sustainable? Three contested sociotechnical imaginaries for transforming the European agri-food system

The European Commission's Farm to Fork Strategy aims to transform the European Union's agrifood system to address sustainability, health, and equity challenges. Central to this transformation is Horizon Europe, the EU's flagship research and innovation funding program, which mobilizes public and private investment in agri-food technologies. Drawing on a Sociotechnical Imaginary (STI) framework, this paper analyses 26 Horizon Europe Calls (2021–2024) to examine how visions for EU agrifood systems are co-produced, legitimized, and contested. We identify three dominant imaginaries: (1) nature-based solutions as pathways to sustainability; (2) alternative proteins as key to promoting health; and (3) smart technologies as enablers of fairness and inclusion. While these imaginaries claim to advance sustainability, health, and equity goals, our analysis reveals that they predominantly reflect the interests of powerful institutional and corporate actors. These technocentric visions facilitate the commodification of nature, promote surveillance-based data extraction models, and consolidate control over agrifood systems in the hands of a few dominant players. We further demonstrate how these dominant imaginaries marginalize alternative visions advocated by food sovereignty movements, farmer organizations, and watchdog groups such as IPES-Food, ETC Group, La Via Campesina and European Coordination Via Campesina (ECVC). These alternative imaginaries emphasize agroecology, local knowledge systems, and participatory governance, yet remain largely excluded from EU funding priorities and policy frameworks. We argue for the urgent need to embed participatory technology assessment and data sovereignty principles within EU agrifood research and innovation governance. Such measures are critical to democratizing decision-making, preventing technology lock-in, and ensuring more equitable and sustainable food system transformations in Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Planning E Nature and Space
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486251381335
Primary Topic
Organic Food and Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fairer, healthier, and more sustainable? Three contested sociotechnical imaginaries for transforming the European agri-food system

Martin Hvarregaard Thorsøe, A. H. Omar
Environment and Planning E Nature and Space
Organic Food and Agriculture
article

Fairer, healthier, and more sustainable? Three contested sociotechnical imaginaries for transforming the European agri-food system

Martin Hvarregaard Thorsøe, A. H. Omar
article en

Abstract

The European Commission's Farm to Fork Strategy aims to transform the European Union's agrifood system to address sustainability, health, and equity challenges. Central to this transformation is Horizon Europe, the EU's flagship research and innovation funding program, which mobilizes public and private investment in agri-food technologies. Drawing on a Sociotechnical Imaginary (STI) framework, this paper analyses 26 Horizon Europe Calls (2021–2024) to examine how visions for EU agrifood systems are co-produced, legitimized, and contested. We identify three dominant imaginaries: (1) nature-based solutions as pathways to sustainability; (2) alternative proteins as key to promoting health; and (3) smart technologies as enablers of fairness and inclusion. While these imaginaries claim to advance sustainability, health, and equity goals, our analysis reveals that they predominantly reflect the interests of powerful institutional and corporate actors. These technocentric visions facilitate the commodification of nature, promote surveillance-based data extraction models, and consolidate control over agrifood systems in the hands of a few dominant players. We further demonstrate how these dominant imaginaries marginalize alternative visions advocated by food sovereignty movements, farmer organizations, and watchdog groups such as IPES-Food, ETC Group, La Via Campesina and European Coordination Via Campesina (ECVC). These alternative imaginaries emphasize agroecology, local knowledge systems, and participatory governance, yet remain largely excluded from EU funding priorities and policy frameworks. We argue for the urgent need to embed participatory technology assessment and data sovereignty principles within EU agrifood research and innovation governance. Such measures are critical to democratizing decision-making, preventing technology lock-in, and ensuring more equitable and sustainable food system transformations in Europe.

Environment and Planning E Nature and SpaceVol. 9(1)
Aarhus University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Organic Food and Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.