STEAM education: Assessment in the architecture curriculum

This study examines the evaluation of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education within the architecture curriculum. By discussing the application and impact of STEAM education in the architecture curriculum, this study aims to clarify its role in improving the quality of architecture education. Taking the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) approach, this study also assesses the degrees of association and influence between various components of STEAM education in the architecture curriculum. It is found that the engineering course group has the highest centrality, while the arts course group has the lowest. This study emphasizes the strengthening of the leading role of the arts course group and provides suggestions. This study not only reveals the mutual impact relations between different components of STEAM education in architectural education but also provides practical implications and possible research directions for educational practice, offering a scientific basis and practical guidelines for promoting innovation and development of architectural education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17251
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

STEAM education: Assessment in the architecture curriculum

Wei-Ling Hsu, Zuorong Dong, Lin Mou, Shan Gao
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education
Design Education and Practice
article

STEAM education: Assessment in the architecture curriculum

Wei-Ling Hsu, Zuorong Dong, Lin Mou, Shan Gao
article en

Abstract

This study examines the evaluation of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education within the architecture curriculum. By discussing the application and impact of STEAM education in the architecture curriculum, this study aims to clarify its role in improving the quality of architecture education. Taking the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) approach, this study also assesses the degrees of association and influence between various components of STEAM education in the architecture curriculum. It is found that the engineering course group has the highest centrality, while the arts course group has the lowest. This study emphasizes the strengthening of the leading role of the arts course group and provides suggestions. This study not only reveals the mutual impact relations between different components of STEAM education in architectural education but also provides practical implications and possible research directions for educational practice, offering a scientific basis and practical guidelines for promoting innovation and development of architectural education.

Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology EducationVol. 21(10)
Jiaying University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

STEAM education: Assessment in the architecture curriculum — Wei-Ling Hsu, Zuorong Dong, et al. · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS